NiTRO + Creative Matters

Perspectives on creative arts in higher education

The Human Touch In An Automated World: Are The Creative Arts Ready To Respond?

By Arun Sharma — Creative and performing arts disciplines are at an interesting juncture. After decades of concern about lack of funding, and about being sidelined in favour of the STEM disciplines, there may be some positive signals.  The question is whether these disciplines are ready for the opportunities emerging from these signals.

Much has been written about the significant scale of the creative sector, and the enhanced value that creative and design inputs bring to almost every sector of the economy. Creativity in the workforce is increasingly seen as a desirable and differentiating capability – it is not uncommon for business executives to take acting lessons to enhance their effectiveness, and the MFA (Master of Fine Arts) has been promoted in business periodicals as an out of the box alternative to the MBA.

Martha Nussbaum has eloquently noted in her book “Not for Profit” that the creative and performing arts have been an integral part of a broad liberal education dating back to the experiments of Dewey and Tagore during the first half of the twentieth century. These disciplines cultivate the imagination and engender empathy. A case can be made that they are even more relevant in a world being transformed by technology.

Technologies of automation and big data, underpinned by the cumulative effect of exponential growth in computing power – a growth that began in the 1950s – are transforming professions and disrupting almost every sector of the economy. There is no immediate end in sight to this exponential growth, and with each doubling of computing power, Artificial Intelligence increasingly begins to resemble human intelligence. There has been much speculation, often with alarming overtones, about the dire consequence of these advances on current jobs and professions.

It is difficult to predict the extent and the rate at which machines will replace humans in the workforce, but it is clear that “rationality” is more vulnerable to automation than emotions, drives and storytelling imperatives that make us human, if only for the reason that the search space for the latter is immensely more complex and vast. This has consequences for skills and capabilities that will continue to have currency in the job market. Employers will seek out graduates with attributes often associated with the creative and performing arts, which in turn may influence students to broaden their educational experience by including study of these disciplines as a means of differentiation.

Let us fast forward and imagine a time in the not too distant future where every student wishes to take a minor in one of the creative and performing arts disciplines – they have become the source of a new set of sought-after generic attributes. This will surely do wonders for the financial viability of those disciplines, but can they scale up in a way that society can afford?

A discussion on productivity improvement does not always sit well with the creative and performing arts. At the risk of dredging up the now familiar argument by Baumol and Bowen on the subject of “cost disease”, they observed as early as the 1960s that productivity gains are unlikely to offset wage increases in the arts and education sectors as they do in other sectors of the economy. Bowen, in his recent book, “Higher Education in the Digital Age” quotes Robert Frank, “While productivity gains have made it possible to assemble cars with only a tiny fraction of the labour that was once required, it still takes four musicians nine minutes to perform (the first movement of) Beethoven’s String Quartet No. 4 in C minor just as it did in the 19th century.”

Now, one may say that this is perfectly fine, experimental attempts to replace a musician or two by a robot may have some novelty value, find a niche following and may even one day become a popular genre, but by and large we are not talking about productivity improvement in the “outputs” of the creative and performing arts.  In fact, as Bakker has noted, the technology of motion picture did make theatre accessible by transforming a labour-intensive service into a non-rival commodity, and one can see how photography did the same to aspects of visual arts.

What is needed is productivity improvement in the way we teach our students in these fields. Technology is beginning to tackle the “cost disease” in education, and nowhere is the need more urgent than in the teaching of creative and performing arts. The traditional approaches may have served us well, but they simply cannot scale in a cost effective way if there is a quantum jump in demand. Of course there may well be some cultural resistance to changing the way we have done things in the past. However, it is difficult to argue that technology has no role to play in improving productivity in how students learn creative and performing arts, whether it is the use of motion capture cameras in teaching dance, or the potential for technologies such as speech recognition, machine learning and cognitive assistants in facilitating practice of music. A careful analysis of the teaching and learning process, followed by an understanding of where human experts and expertise are essential and where technology is better able to assist, will allow for larger class sizes without any loss of learning effectiveness. If such initiatives were rigorously tested for learning outcomes via randomized controlled trials, universities would have the confidence to prescribe these subjects as part of a broader curriculum for all students.

Universities are about human capital, and the human capital needed for a world where rationality is commodified will necessarily benefit from an education that appeals to our humanity. The creative and performing arts have a major role to play, and one with enormous potential to expand. But to make this expansion possible they will have to reach out to computer scientists in the first instance, and eventually to behavioural economists and neuroscientists to entice the “engineer” to their courses.

Arun Sharma is Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research and Commercialisation) at QUT. He has played a leadership role in developing Australian research capability in information and communication technology. He was co-founder of NICTA and the CRC for Smart Internet Technology, and also served as the Head of School of Computer Science and Engineering at UNSW.  He is currently a member of the Advance Queensland Expert Advisory Panel and has served on a number of advisory roles, including the ARC Council, Queensland Premier’s Smart State Council and the Premier’s Business Roundtable. He is a past National Chair of the Australia India Business Council.


More from this issue

More from this issue

By Su Baker, President, Australian Council of Deans and Directors of Creative Arts — In this issue of NiTRO we ask how well are we connecting the academy with artist practice outside the Citadel. How well are we preparing our students and how do we support our colleagues in their core career aspirations, that in most cases will be outside the university and educational context?
By Dr Jenny Wilson — In his 1999 book, Art Subjects, Howard Singerman saw the university as ‘a crucial structuring site where artists and art worlds are mapped and reproduced'. University teaching, research and engagement agenda and the strategies that are adopted serve to enhance or restrict how its artists, staff and students, connect with and advance their genres and professions.
By Malcolm Gillies — Sitting on my shelf for the last eighteen years has been a copy of "The Strand Report". Dennis Strand's excellent work was for a project overseen by the Head of the Canberra School of Art, David Williams, and chaired by Peter Karmel, a leading economist and former vice-chancellor of the ANU. It was the first coordinated attempt to bring together the full range of visual and performing artists to address how they might better fit in with the developing research expectations of the National Unified System.
By Tamara Winikoff OAM — Earlier this year ArtsHub, published an article by National Association for the Visual Arts (NAVA) CEO Tamara Winikoff on the changes in art schools following the Dawkins amalgamations. It collated views and experiences of those currently working in the university sector and provides a useful starting point to consider how contemporary universities are influencing artistic practice. With the permission of NAVA and Arts Hub the article is republished below and has been updated by Tamara for NiTRO.
By Eileen Siddins and Ryan Daniel — As Bourdieu describes in his text ‘Firing Back’, the modern world has moved into a work situation dominated by employment precariousness, constant insecurity and downsizing to increase profits and therefore shareholder return. While artists have in general faced employment stresses for centuries, the impact of the broader economic move towards dominant players and markets is affecting the art world as well.
By Dr Sue Gillett — The current trend in Australian universities has seen the proportion of enrolments in Arts subjects declining over the last decade, with regional universities and campuses more significantly affected.
By Associate Professor Vanessa Tomlinson — The second Australia Percussion Gathering, directed by Associate Professor Vanessa Tomlinson alongside advisors Tom O'Kelly, Dr. Louise Devenish and Francois Combemorel was held at Queensland Conservatorium, Griffith University in July 2016. Sitting somewhere between a music festival, a conference and a music camp, the six day event brought together industry professionals, international guests, and an impressive 96% of all students studying percussion in tertiary institutions in Australia.
by Ian Haig — The status of the Avant grade has now been systematized into what Dave Hickey calls the ‘therapeutic institution' – a self-propagating structure of academics, curators, critics and artists proclaiming arts goodness for the world.
By Dr Peter Knight — The relationship between academia and artistic practice is in flux, and in my view that's one of the reasons why the space in which they meet is an exciting place to be working. I undertook two postgraduate degrees in music both of which had an emphasis on practice-based approaches.
By Professor Clive Barstow and Dr Jenny Wilson — On the eve of his 25th anniversary of his emigration to Australia, Jenny Wilson talks to artist and academic Clive Barstow about his reflections on arts education.
By Dr Linda Ludwig — The Symposium at the FHNW Academy of Art and Design in Basel – introduced by Carla Delfos from the European League of the Institutes of the Arts – brought together methodological reflections on research in the arts with recent activities from researchers in the field. It was goal of the Symposium to discuss how art and design generates knowledge that is of relevance to society.
By Professor Pamela Burnard — Why is it an imperative for arts institutions and academies to identify creative teaching in relation to creative learning as a vital way of addressing the politics of higher education? What is it about creative teaching in relation to creative learning that offers new priorities, new narratives, new forms of knowledge, new ways of ‘knowing how to speak' and ‘knowing how to hear' for creative teachers, artists and artist scholars?