NiTRO Creative Matters

Perspectives on creative arts in higher education

Art and the Apparatus of Higher Education

The gradual shift from social democracy to neoliberalism in the west since the 1980s has significantly affected the apparatus of higher education. University and college heads have shifted their priorities from developing knowledge through education and research for social benefit, to increasing the wealth of the institution (and their own salaries) through competing for student numbers and positions in league tables.

By Rob Gawthrop

The gradual shift from social democracy to neoliberalism in the west since the 1980s has significantly affected the apparatus of higher education. University and college heads have shifted their priorities from developing knowledge through education and research for social benefit, to increasing the wealth of the institution (and their own salaries) through competing for student numbers and positions in league tables. Students are now entering university as consumers of education for employment 

The largely defensive positions taken during periods of cuts and so-called reforms were not supplanted by progressive reviews during periods of reinvestment and expansion (Gawthrop p37). The modernist pedagogic legacy of studio culture, and the separation of practical teaching from histories and theories continues to dominate art schools and yet the positive aspect that allowed long periods of self-directed practical enquiry have become less sustainable.

Undergraduate courses have become subjected to testing regimes, algorithmic marking schemes and league tables based on degree results, retention and employability. The effect of the changes of the educational apparatus on art is a shift from the heuristic, speculative and sensible towards the didactic, teleological and intelligible.

 In the UK in 1998 the New Labour government funded the expansion of higher education with the introduction of top-up fees and student loans. ‘participation in higher education increased from 19.3% in 1990 to 33% in 2000.’ (Bolton 2012). The Conservative-LibDem coalition government’s 2017 HE Act raised student fees to full cost. A metric based scheme will place universities in a league table that will affect the fees that universities can charge. If recruitment targets are thirty students short for example,  a £1m (around Au$1.7m)  deficit over three years would result. Neither loans nor grants were available for masters course until last year though some studentships for research degrees have been available since the mid-nineties. The development of research culture and practice-based PhDs is mainly advantageous, enabling staff to legitimately continue with their practice with institutional funding. The disadvantages are that research has to conform to institutional agendas which are increasingly finance driven and that art as research can often be academic, illustrative or literal.   Undergraduate courses have become subjected to testing regimes, algorithmic marking schemes and league tables based on degree results, retention and employability.

The effect of the changes of the educational apparatus on art is a shift from the heuristic, speculative and sensible towards the didactic, teleological and intelligible.  At undergraduate level ‘Instead of managing the transition to adulthood, universities seek to safeguard and protect the physical and emotional welfare of students, removing all element of social or educational risk. For some students this means they leave university as childlike as when they started’ (Williams p136). It is at post-graduate level that it becomes possible for a student to develop a practice but access is restricted to only those who can afford it. Although a return to social democracy could eventually restore a more accessible, democratic and egalitarian approach to higher education, the academic apparatus is likely to remain much the same.

Without . . . changes the trend will continue for students to make work that reproduces or has the appearance of saleable art without any real understanding or questioning of it.

For undergraduates, questions of independence, what art is, interdisciplinarity (particularly in relation to digital media,  music & sound, dance & choreography and theatre & performance) and how professional practice operates (employability) are central to the development of art education.  ‘… to study independently, set goals, manage workloads and meet deadlines; anticipate and accommodate change, and work within contexts of ambiguity, uncertainty and unfamiliarity’ (QAA p18) requires sustained periods of self-directed practical enquiry which under a fragmented structure can be difficult. However this can be achieved through semester length modules of self directed projects as professional practice including internships, international exchanges, exhibitions, site-specific or engaged practices, without institutional attendance. The consequent reduction in contact teaching and use of facilities during such periods could release hours and enable one-to-one tutorials of longer duration than presently possible. Lecture/seminar programmes concerned with how the art world works (alongside other curatorial, aesthetic, cultural and critical contexts) would inform students of the economic and political world they would be entering into. Studios, storage and social space would need to be made available according to need rather than providing identical and inferior spaces for all students. 

Without such changes the trend will continue for students to make work that reproduces or has the appearance of saleable art without any real understanding or questioning of it. Graduates are unlikely to have the critical skills for their personal and artistic development to be able to cope with the world they find themselves in. These approaches need to be implemented urgently.


References

Bolton, Paul 2012 Education: Historical statistics. House of Commons Library http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/22771/ accessed 13th September 2017

Gawthrop, Rob 2016 Politics Pedagogy Art in Allsopp R & Hiltbrunner M (Eds.) Performance Research Vol 21 No 6 On Radical Education.  London: Routledge

QAA (2017) Subject Benchmark Statement, Art & Design, Gloucester: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/SBS-Art-and-Design-17.pdf accessed 13th September 2017

Williams, Joanna (2013) Consuming Higher Education, London: Bloomsbury.


Rob Gawthrop is an artist using noise, improvisation and moving image. Performances have included Humber Street Gallery Hull, Tate Modern and Newlyn Art Gallery, plus specific sites, independent spaces and festivals. Politics Practice Pedagogy Art published in Performance Research (Routledge) 2016, Thunder and Lightning  in Reverberations (Continuum) 2012. Coordinated School of Noises Falmouth 2010-14, co-director of Hull Art Lab 2004-6, Founder member of Hull Time Based Arts 1984-2003.  Currently associate lecturer, Sheffield Hallam University, previously coordinator of MA Fine Falmouth University to 2015,  Director of Art, Dartington College of Arts to 2009 and Head of Art, Hull to 2004.

More from this issue

More from this issue

The contemporary world faces an array of inter-connected daunting challenges - geopolitical, enviro-climatic, economic-developmental. While science and technology address many of them, their agenda is only half the story.

A bleaker aspect of writing for an intellectually self-conscious publication like NiTRO is the obligation to respond rationally to what are, in the end, irrational points of view.  As the political Right dissolves into its constituent pathologies, its policies transmogrify into a mix of prejudice and panic. . . This injects an air of unreality into the policy-making process.  “Data” is obsessively gathered, but selectively deployed.  Some areas of government expenditure must repeatedly account for their “impact”.  Others are judged of self-evident merit and anything that contradicts this is downplayed or ignored.

The DDCA’s 2017 conference took place at the Victorian College of the Arts during Melbourne’s recent respite from the cold weather - quite disconcerting for those of us from ‘up north’ who had dressed for the ‘polar extremes’ of our southern states. In a program designed to prompt discussion we welcomed a wide range of artists from within, and outside, academia to consider the theme ‘Beyond Research: Creative Arts in the Impact, Engagement and Innovative Agenda’.

There is a growing sense that something is happening in the arts and creative sector.  The sector is finding its collective voice at state, national and regional level, with terms such as ‘artist-led’, ‘artist-driven’, ‘sector-driven’ being used in the development of programs and policy. This visibility and attention to the arts and contribution of such to the sector does not appear to be similarly matched in education and learning realms.

A contingent part of the creative economy, tertiary creative arts education has a responsibility to its community of students, alumni and partners, to the broader arts sector and the political landscape that surrounds it. We are therefore subject not just to the politics of cultural policy pertaining to the arts, which affect the forms of support and types of arts forms and practices we include on our curricula, but to education and economic policies which shape the conditions under which we teach and undertake research.

Professor Gary Foley was a key member of the Aboriginal Black Power Movement and a critical figure in establishing the Aboriginal Embassy protest of 1972. He has been at the centre of major political activities in Australia for more than 45 years. In 2011 and 2012 he created and performed his one man show Foley with Ilbijerri Theatre, Jon Hawkes and Edwina Howell, for the Melbourne Arts Festival and the Sydney Festival. In 2015 he was the recipient of the Australia Council’s Red Ochre Award for a lifetime achievement in the Arts.   Dr Edwina Howell has worked with Professor Foley

In this edition of NiTRO our contributors consider the contemporary relationship between tertiary art and politics from the perspective of the role of art to engage with the political message, but also to explore how the political message, and political decisions that affect arts and education, are influencing tertiary arts.

In August 2017, I curated a week-long festival at the Sydney Conservatorium of Music and the Seymour Centre, University of Sydney, entitled “Out of the Shadows: rediscovering Jewish music and theatre”. This was the fourth of five festivals staged around the world, part of a large research project called Performing the Jewish Archive, funded by the British Arts & Humanities Research Council.  Together with ten colleagues from three other continents, the research focus was the aesthetic creations of Jewish artists in the 20th century, artists who were affected by persecution, flight and internment.

Academics convinced of the folly of user pays systems of education have long complained about the steady decline of equity resulting from the ratchetting effect applied to the HECS scheme since its introduction. This is compounded by the attendant impact on quality as each school and program must approach revenue neutrality through a combination of fees and research income.