Using my own creative/critical hybrid thesis as a paradigm, this essay suggests working within that tension by playing with and subverting conventional organising elements of form and structure – literature review, chapters, linear progression, so on. Here, I utilise Deleuze and Guattari’s minor literature and Genette’s concept of paratextuality as methods that are inherently in relation to (and so in dialogue with) their disciplinary or cultural contexts, enabling a deterritorialisation of the site of the creative writing PhD towards new ways of thinking about (and moving through) the body of the thesis and its attendant modes of knowledge production. In this way, the paper proposes a roadmap for what Krauth and Nash call the blended ‘creative-exegetical genre’ (2019), one that is agile and relational rather than fixed in taxonomies or disciplines. In keeping with the contention that structure constitutes its own mode of knowing, this paper enacts its own experiments, fragmenting and devolving in its conclusion, just like the project it reflects on.
Keywords Doctoral writing, experimental exegetical models, deterritorialising creative writing, creative practice research
DOI 10.65289/creativematters.2025.10.6
Sarah Gory is a writer, editor and researcher. Her critical-creative writing has been published in journals and magazines, and as book chapters both in Australia and overseas. Sarah completed her PhD in 2025 and is a lecturer at RMIT University.