NiTRO Creative Matters

Perspectives on creative arts in higher education

Dancing Elusive Knowledges Across the Research Terrain

By Associate Professor Cheryl Stock AM — The narrative of knowledge is almost always underpinned by the cognitive but how we know the world is often through the experiential. Whilst we have moved a long way in redefining knowledge in research terms to include the processes and outcomes of our practices (artistic, creative, professional) and importantly have privileged the artist’s voice as the expert in this recasting of what a knowledge claim might look like, some art forms prove more problematic than others in this endeavour.

What if the artist’s voice is embodied thought, articulated through movement, and not text or image or code? For dance artists our narrative of knowledge resides with and in the body.

The dancing body is highly trained and for those who do not ‘live in their body’, it can seem an esoteric language outside the realm of their experience, apart from its visual, aesthetic and affective connection and the pleasurable (or otherwise) sensation of movement.  If one cannot emulate that experience or understand its ontology, how can it be shared and indeed create the transferable knowledge which research requires?  Perhaps it is a question of translation – the development of a nuanced language in order to capture the visceral, kinaesthetic, sensory and spatio/temporal qualities that, although partaking of it,  do not lie predominantly in the cognitive realm. This translation process is one way live dance research can tell the stories of the body and bypass representations via description or illustration, including the traditional two-dimensional digital reductive versions of the original.

Dance is arguably the most challenging art form to generate research through practice . . . In its most abstract and purest form, it inherently courts the danger of narcissism in examining and exploring its own moving being with no apparent external material referent

Dance is arguably the most challenging art form to generate research through practice for these reasons.  In its most abstract and purest form, it inherently courts the danger of narcissism in examining and exploring its own moving being with no apparent external material referent. Even a choreographer making dance for other bodies, works in a collaborative world that requires profound understandings between bodies, with an accumulated knowledge of a finely tuned and deeply experienced movement practice. This allows the dancing researcher to make discoveries through the body, rather than the more conventional framework of discoveries about the body. So if practice led research contributes original knowledge to the field through its practice and that practice is not easily accessible, how do we translate its processes and findings so they can be disseminated and shared, without falling into self-referentiality?

It is helpful and indeed crucial to frame the research practice through exploring and documenting/analysing its context, its making and doing processes, and its potential for meaning-making with the aid of discursive and propositional text. This is a valuable part of dance research and moreover, much – even most – dance is not merely about itself but a vehicle for exploring other concepts and ideas outside dance per se. But in terms of what it uncovers as a knowledge claim through the act of making and dancing can only be revealed via an interpretation of its embodied experience. I suggest that research findings can be approached in at least two ways. The first is through an accumulation of multi-modal digital representations from diverse perspectives, including images and voice in a non-textual equivalent of ethnographic ‘thick description’ (Geertz, 1973). The second (together with a digital documentation of the practice/process) encompasses a text-based illumination of the experiential nature of the research through non-discursive, perhaps poetic, language that approximates its symbolic, metaphoric, allusive, ephemeral and affective dimensions. Whatever its specificities, as a valid form of research, we must be able to articulate, albeit indirectly, a contribution to advancing embodied knowledge as revealed through dancing.

There is a largely unexamined myth around the extended timeframe allowed in a research project and a correlating improvement in the outcomes of the practice. In dance, in particular, that myth extends to claiming that more time is spent in practice, but in reality it mostly means more time is spent in thinking about, reading about and researching practice rather than practising.

Such research foregrounds what Melrose refers to as ‘practitioner expertise’ (2006) and herein lies a problem rarely discussed in academia but which I have raised in a previous publication – the unresolved tensions between industry-based artists and academic artists. For those artists undertaking research degrees it has been my experience, both as a supervisor and examiner, that there is a largely unexamined myth around the extended timeframe allowed in a research project and a correlating improvement in the outcomes of the practice. In dance, in particular, that myth extends to claiming that more time is spent in practice, but in reality it mostly means more time is spent in thinking about, reading about and researching practice rather than practising. Academic dance artists often have less access to studio space and working with professional dancers than industry-based dance artists who tend to work on a project basis to strict and shorter deadlines, requiring a greater focus on actually dancing and experimenting in the studio. There are obvious advantages in prolonged time for reflection and slowly building momentum to create/perform a work but there is also a danger that ‘practitioner expertise’, reliant on continual studio practice, may diminish if ‘talking’ takes over ‘doing’.

Practice-led research higher degrees are becoming a growth industry in an arts sector that is contracting, at least in the frequency of opportunity, and in academic settings in the erosion of conservatory training which places practice at its core. Finding a balance between these two crucial approaches through cross sectoral industry and academic partnerships may arguably prove as important in sustaining our sector as focussing our energies solely on research outcomes, important as they are.


References

Geertz, Clifford (1973) Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture. In The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books, 3-30.

Melrose, Susan (2006) ‘Not yet, and already no longer’: loitering with intent between the expert practitioner at work, and the archive, Performance as Knowledge Symposium, Centre for Research into the Creation in the Performing Arts (ResCen), London, May 2006, http://www.rescen.net/archive/PaK_may06/PaK06_transcripts4_1.html (Accessed 4 August 2016).

Stock, Cheryl (2010) Aesthetic tensions: evaluating outcomes for practice-led research and industry, TEXT Special issue No 8 October 2010, Symposium: Creative and practice-led research—current status, future plans, Oct. 2010 http://www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue8/content.htm (Accessed 4 August 2016)


A/ Prof Cheryl Stock, PhD, AM has worked as a dancer, choreographer, director, educator, researcher and advocate. She is currently Head of Cultural Leadership at NIDA, as well as serving as Secretary General of World Dance Alliance and Adjunct Professor in the Creative Industries Faculty at Queensland University of Technology, where she previously held positions as Head of Dance and Director of Postgraduate Studies. A recipient of the Australian Dance Award’s Lifetime Achievement, Cheryl was founding Artistic Director of Dance North and currently Artistic Advisor. She has created over 50 dance works as well as 20 collaborative exchanges in Asia. Her publications and practice encompass interdisciplinary and intercultural site specific performance, contemporary Australian and Asian dance, and practice-led research. 

More from this issue

More from this issue

Independent artists are faced with a challenging and transforming landscape that requires adaptive resilience in order to thrive creatively, today and in the future. How do we, as tertiary educators, empower and enable artists to build strong and flexible, professional contemporary art practices? To address this issue, my current research draws models of praxis from artist-run initiatives (ARI) in the Visual Arts industry, specifically from my experience as director of Boxcopy Contemporary Art Space.

By Su Baker, President, Australian Council of Deans and Directors of Creative Arts — Over 2 decades the creative art academic community has grown and matured as a sector -  so have the questions of method and purpose of publically funded research, that influence the processes of evaluation. Discussions around impact and ‘end-user’ value is a live issue at the ARC and we look forward to the new thinking that will shortly emerge. The creative arts depend almost entirely on end-user experience, and the impact of these experiences aspire to have real and meaningful impact on peoples lives.
By Dr Jenny Wilson. DDCA’s Research officer Jenny Wilson caught up with Henk Borgdorff in Amsterdam in April 2016,  hot on the heels of his recent speaking tour of European and UK universities, art and music schools, to find out more about artistic research and European experiences of the politics of art and higher education.
By Professor Graeme Sullivan Visual arts has no singular function because it can be called on to do just about anything. Arts’ usefulness is because it is edgeless and homeless—art is masterful at shape shifting and form fitting
By Professor Jeri Kroll Since the Strand report (1998), scholars have been unpacking the manifold ways in which creative works can be research. Explaining the usefulness of questions to doctoral candidates not only keeps supervisors honest, but also keeps at the forefront of everyone’s mind why theory is unavoidable.
By Professor Paul Draper and Professor Scott Harrison Communities of profession, the old academy and the new academy, intimately rub up against each other and while some research may still be considered ‘more equal’ than others for now – this evolving mix can only positively impact on the rise of artistic research, its acceptance in society and its measurement by governments and universities.
By Dr Danny Butt — During the 1990s and 2000s, as readers of NiTRO know well, an intensive debate took place among art and design academics as to whether their practices and those of their graduate students could be called research, and if so what “contribution to knowledge” might be made by the creative output, as distinct from the writing that has traditionally accompanied submissions in higher degrees in creative arts.
By Professor Margaret Sheil — On my last outing in an ACUADS conference,  I was described by Flinders University’s Julian Meryick as the “artist’s ideal of a scientist… impatient with the reduction of everything down to short term utility.” So as I venture once again into the creative arts domain,  I draw on a scientific analogy. The principle of chemical equilibrium refers to a system in which the rate of consumption of inputs is the same as that at which outputs are produced so that the system is in a stable state of consumption and production.
By Professor Ross Woodrow — The decision by the Australia Research Council (ARC) to achieve the long-mooted merging of the Higher Education Research Data Collection (HERDC) and the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) exercise by adeptly disappearing the HERDC has been welcomed by many discipline leaders, and not just those in the creative arts. With the inclusive ERA becoming the singular evaluation of research quality across Australia, there couldn’t be a better time to rethink the classification of research in universities.
By Associate Professor Robert Burke and Dr. Andrys Onsman — Criticism of the scientific methods of doing research has increasingly pointed out that all experimental research involves some sort of creative leap. In the performing arts such creative leaps are fundamental to artistry.
By Dr Leo Berkeley — The creative practice of filmmaking, understood as a form of academic research, has been growing in scale and significance within Australian universities for several years.  While doctorates involving the making of a film have been occurring for decades, it is only relatively recently that the academic screen production community has been seeking to more systematically establish how the production of a film can lead to the discovery of new knowledge.  
By Dr Jenny Wilson As many in creative arts grappled with the amalgamation challenges of the 90s, few were aware that the Dawkins reforms also had increased the centrality of research to university funding. This ‘blissful ignorance’ was not to last.
By Professor Brad Buckley and Associate Professor John Conomos — Recently, there has been much discussion in the press and beyond about the importance of Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) subjects at high school and at university. In particular, the Commonwealth Government’s National Innovation and Science Agenda has focused exclusively on STEM disciplines. However, that discussion misses the central importance of creativity, inventiveness and innovation.
By Dr Kate Tregloan and Professor Kit Wise — Interdisciplinarity has been widely recognised as a valuable response to the wicked problems of our time. The ability to collaborate across disciplinary boundaries brings together different perspectives and expertise, and allows entirely new approaches and solutions to emerge. To prepare students and graduates for the complex challenges of the twenty first century we need good quality interdisciplinary programs. But how do we know what is ‘good’?
By Professor Estelle Barrett and Professor Barbara Bolt — At a roundtable at the Australian Council of University Art Schools (ACUADS) annual conference in 2014, panelists were asked to address the following question: What impact are higher degree research programs having on emerging trends and themes in contemporary art? Whilst the panel felt that the development of higher degree research programs in creative arts did not lead to better “art” they did agree that it has profoundly affected the way art is framed and understood both within the academy and beyond.
By Professor Margaret Gardner AO — The Australian Government’s Federal Budget announcement in May was confirmation that funding for the Office for Learning and Teaching would be discontinued after this year. The news, though not unexpected, represented a blow to funding for teaching and learning scholarship in Australia.
By Dr Tim Cahill and Professor Julian Meyrick — ‘In God we trust.  All others bring data,’ quipped US statistician, W. Edwards Deeming.  As he implied, measurement is an inherently conservative occupation.  Units of appraisal have to be agreed in advance, while the aim of measuring something is usually to compare it with something that already exists.

By Julie Hare There are a lot of things that happen in universities that the majority of the population don’t know about. Research is one of them. The average punter – even the average undergraduate – would have little idea as the scope, scale and importance of research that takes place. And having a scientist […]

By Lynn Churchill and Jill Franz, IDEA (Interior Design Interior Architecture Educator’s Association) — IDEA comprises 12 International Institutions providing a minimum four-year Bachelor degree in the disciplines of Interior Design (ID), Interior Architecture (IA) and Spatial Design (SD). Most include an Honours program and the opportunity to undertake further research in Masters and PhD programs in compliance with the object of IDEA - excellence in ID/IA/SD education and research. Academic Research is a significant requirement for most academics in these disciplines.
By Associate Professor Denise Ferris and Professor Marie Sierra, Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools (ACUADS) — The National Innovation and Science Agenda, launched in December 2015, has significant consequences for tertiary institutions, and in particular, for the art and design disciplines, as well as the broader arts, humanities and social science (HASS) fields.