NiTRO Creative Matters

Perspectives on creative arts in higher education

Multiple Measures: Improving Interdisciplinary Learning by Benchmarking Quality Assessment

By Dr Kate Tregloan and Professor Kit Wise — Interdisciplinarity has been widely recognised as a valuable response to the wicked problems of our time. The ability to collaborate across disciplinary boundaries brings together different perspectives and expertise, and allows entirely new approaches and solutions to emerge. To prepare students and graduates for the complex challenges of the twenty first century we need good quality interdisciplinary programs. But how do we know what is ‘good’?

The recently completed Multiple Measures research project, funded by the Office for Learning and Teaching (OLT) focused on interdisciplinary (ID) learning and teaching to investigate the meaning of ‘good’ when different disciplines collaborate. The project identified ID units/courses/subjects delivered at Australian universities that included the creative arts and humanities, and focused on ID assessment design for undergraduate and coursework masters studies.

The project team, led by Dr Kate Tregloan and supported by Project Manager Dr Debbie Symons from Monash Faculty of Art Design and Architecture,  included art and design leaders: Prof Kit Wise (Tasmania); Graham Forsyth (UNSW); Prof Su Baker (VCA); and a reference group drawn from across Australia.

The Multiple Measures project aimed to:

  • identify objectives and values of interdisciplinary learning;
  • contribute to a shared understanding of ID assessment standards;
  • support teaching staff to develop, articulate and apply assessment approaches and criteria for ID tasks;
  • improve the equitable comparison of ID assessment across higher education institutions.

The key outcome of the project, the Multiple Measures online tool and website offers a rich library of ID exemplars.  The library can be searched using bespoke filters developed through the project, that consider Student Cohort, Learning Outcomes and Pedagogy. The tool is designed to help educators to identify relevant comparators to benchmark and inform their own approach to ID education, and to inform their design of ID assessment. This can include developing ideas for ID engagements, as well as ID units/courses/subjects already delivered. Outcomes of the Multiple Measures project are also informing broader discussions of interdisciplinary education and its value.

A comprehensive series of workshops informed the project and the development of the tool. This has included numerous events in Melbourne, Sydney, Adelaide and Canberra, with participants from every state of Australia. The Multiple Measures website and tool was launched at Monash University in Melbourne jn June 2016.  It has also been presented to an international audience as part of the DRS2016 conference at the University of Brighton (UK) in July 2016.  Further workshops are currently being delivered.

The Multiple Measures project seeks to support educators as they develop new approaches to ID education and assessment. It has brought together a great range of committed educators who have developed innovative and valuable approaches to the development of student abilities, and who have looked beyond the strictures of current paradigms to seek perspectives to offer the future. We have been very fortunate to learn from the experiences and hard-won wisdom of those who contributed to the library through interviews and participation. And the Multiple Measures tool and the library continues to grow! Members from any university throughout Australia  who have new and interesting examples of interdisciplinary education involving the creative arts and humanities are invited to contribute by visiting the Multiple Measures site

Further information:

Multiple Measures: Benchmarking quality assessment tasks to facilitate interdisciplinary learning in the creative arts and humanities (OLT ID14-3909) was an Innovation and Development project funded by the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. The project team was led by Dr Kate Tregloan from Monash University Faculty of Art Design & Architecture, with contributions by members Professor Kit Wise from The College of The Arts at the University of Tasmania, Mr Graham Forsyth from UNSW Art & Design, and Prof Su Baker from the VCA at the University of Melbourne, as well as a Reference Group drawn from across Australia.  Dr Debbie Symons from Monash University Faculty of Art Design & Architecture managed the project and the contributions of research assistants, graphic designers, and multimedia developers. 

Dr Kate Tregloan is Associate Dean (Education) of Monash University’s Faculty of Art Design & Architecture. She is a registered architect, and has a particular research interest in the qualitative and quantitative judgments that influence creative development, with national and international publications in this area. She is particularly engaged by the contributions of perspective to innovative outcomes.  She has brought this focus to interdisciplinary education and research collaborations with colleagues from health, science, art and design, in Australian and international institutions.

Professor Kit Wise is Professor of Fine Art and Head of the Tasmanian College of the Arts, University of Tasmania. His research focuses on approaches to and outcomes from interdisciplinary education and research agendas. He is also a practicing artist, art writer and curator. He is an active member of national peak bodies in art and design and has engaged with art schools nationally and internationally in an advisory capacity on interdisciplinary course design, including Massey, New Zealand, Banff in Canada and LaSalle, Singapore.

More from this issue

More from this issue

Independent artists are faced with a challenging and transforming landscape that requires adaptive resilience in order to thrive creatively, today and in the future. How do we, as tertiary educators, empower and enable artists to build strong and flexible, professional contemporary art practices? To address this issue, my current research draws models of praxis from artist-run initiatives (ARI) in the Visual Arts industry, specifically from my experience as director of Boxcopy Contemporary Art Space.

By Su Baker, President, Australian Council of Deans and Directors of Creative Arts — Over 2 decades the creative art academic community has grown and matured as a sector - so have the questions of method and purpose of publically funded research, that influence the processes of evaluation. Discussions around impact and ‘end-user’ value is a live issue at the ARC and we look forward to the new thinking that will shortly emerge. The creative arts depend almost entirely on end-user experience, and the impact of these experiences aspire to have real and meaningful impact on peoples lives.
By Dr Jenny Wilson. DDCA’s Research officer Jenny Wilson caught up with Henk Borgdorff in Amsterdam in April 2016, hot on the heels of his recent speaking tour of European and UK universities, art and music schools, to find out more about artistic research and European experiences of the politics of art and higher education.
By Professor Graeme Sullivan Visual arts has no singular function because it can be called on to do just about anything. Arts’ usefulness is because it is edgeless and homeless—art is masterful at shape shifting and form fitting
By Professor Jeri Kroll Since the Strand report (1998), scholars have been unpacking the manifold ways in which creative works can be research. Explaining the usefulness of questions to doctoral candidates not only keeps supervisors honest, but also keeps at the forefront of everyone’s mind why theory is unavoidable.
By Professor Paul Draper and Professor Scott Harrison Communities of profession, the old academy and the new academy, intimately rub up against each other and while some research may still be considered ‘more equal’ than others for now – this evolving mix can only positively impact on the rise of artistic research, its acceptance in society and its measurement by governments and universities.
By Associate Professor Cheryl Stock AM — The narrative of knowledge is almost always underpinned by the cognitive but how we know the world is often through the experiential. Whilst we have moved a long way in redefining knowledge in research terms to include the processes and outcomes of our practices (artistic, creative, professional) and importantly have privileged the artist’s voice as the expert in this recasting of what a knowledge claim might look like, some art forms prove more problematic than others in this endeavour.
By Dr Danny Butt — During the 1990s and 2000s, as readers of NiTRO know well, an intensive debate took place among art and design academics as to whether their practices and those of their graduate students could be called research, and if so what “contribution to knowledge” might be made by the creative output, as distinct from the writing that has traditionally accompanied submissions in higher degrees in creative arts.
By Professor Margaret Sheil — On my last outing in an ACUADS conference, I was described by Flinders University’s Julian Meryick as the “artist’s ideal of a scientist… impatient with the reduction of everything down to short term utility.” So as I venture once again into the creative arts domain, I draw on a scientific analogy. The principle of chemical equilibrium refers to a system in which the rate of consumption of inputs is the same as that at which outputs are produced so that the system is in a stable state of consumption and production.
By Professor Ross Woodrow — The decision by the Australia Research Council (ARC) to achieve the long-mooted merging of the Higher Education Research Data Collection (HERDC) and the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) exercise by adeptly disappearing the HERDC has been welcomed by many discipline leaders, and not just those in the creative arts. With the inclusive ERA becoming the singular evaluation of research quality across Australia, there couldn’t be a better time to rethink the classification of research in universities.
By Associate Professor Robert Burke and Dr. Andrys Onsman — Criticism of the scientific methods of doing research has increasingly pointed out that all experimental research involves some sort of creative leap. In the performing arts such creative leaps are fundamental to artistry.
By Dr Leo Berkeley — The creative practice of filmmaking, understood as a form of academic research, has been growing in scale and significance within Australian universities for several years. While doctorates involving the making of a film have been occurring for decades, it is only relatively recently that the academic screen production community has been seeking to more systematically establish how the production of a film can lead to the discovery of new knowledge.
By Dr Jenny Wilson As many in creative arts grappled with the amalgamation challenges of the 90s, few were aware that the Dawkins reforms also had increased the centrality of research to university funding. This ‘blissful ignorance’ was not to last.
By Professor Brad Buckley and Associate Professor John Conomos — Recently, there has been much discussion in the press and beyond about the importance of Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) subjects at high school and at university. In particular, the Commonwealth Government’s National Innovation and Science Agenda has focused exclusively on STEM disciplines. However, that discussion misses the central importance of creativity, inventiveness and innovation.
By Professor Estelle Barrett and Professor Barbara Bolt — At a roundtable at the Australian Council of University Art Schools (ACUADS) annual conference in 2014, panelists were asked to address the following question: What impact are higher degree research programs having on emerging trends and themes in contemporary art? Whilst the panel felt that the development of higher degree research programs in creative arts did not lead to better “art” they did agree that it has profoundly affected the way art is framed and understood both within the academy and beyond.
By Professor Margaret Gardner AO — The Australian Government’s Federal Budget announcement in May was confirmation that funding for the Office for Learning and Teaching would be discontinued after this year. The news, though not unexpected, represented a blow to funding for teaching and learning scholarship in Australia.
By Dr Tim Cahill and Professor Julian Meyrick — ‘In God we trust. All others bring data,’ quipped US statistician, W. Edwards Deeming. As he implied, measurement is an inherently conservative occupation. Units of appraisal have to be agreed in advance, while the aim of measuring something is usually to compare it with something that already exists.

By Julie Hare There are a lot of things that happen in universities that the majority of the population don’t know about. Research is one of them. The average punter – even the average undergraduate – would have little idea as the scope, scale and importance of research that takes place. And having a scientist […]

By Lynn Churchill and Jill Franz, IDEA (Interior Design Interior Architecture Educator’s Association) — IDEA comprises 12 International Institutions providing a minimum four-year Bachelor degree in the disciplines of Interior Design (ID), Interior Architecture (IA) and Spatial Design (SD). Most include an Honours program and the opportunity to undertake further research in Masters and PhD programs in compliance with the object of IDEA - excellence in ID/IA/SD education and research. Academic Research is a significant requirement for most academics in these disciplines.
By Associate Professor Denise Ferris and Professor Marie Sierra, Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools (ACUADS) — The National Innovation and Science Agenda, launched in December 2015, has significant consequences for tertiary institutions, and in particular, for the art and design disciplines, as well as the broader arts, humanities and social science (HASS) fields.