NiTRO Creative Matters

Perspectives on creative arts in higher education

The Creative Arts and New Knowledge – Do We Aim For Questions or Answers?

By Professor Jeri Kroll Since the Strand report (1998), scholars have been unpacking the manifold ways in which creative works can be research. Explaining the usefulness of questions to doctoral candidates not only keeps supervisors honest, but also keeps at the forefront of everyone’s mind why theory is unavoidable.

By Professor Jeri Kroll

‘No poet, no artist of any art, has his [sic] complete meaning alone….you must set him, for contrast and comparison, among the dead.’

(T S Eliot, ‘Tradition and the Individual Talent’) 

‘But what is the new knowledge you’re producing?’ Recently I was asked this question at dinner with a colleague from the social sciences, who didn’t intend to challenge the creative arts sector. She really wanted to understand how researchers in the arts went about their work. After explaining as best I could, I realised that having these conversations were eminently useful, because they make us, as creative artists, distill what we do. So what did I say?

Uncertainty or tenuousness does not negate creative work’s benefits. As so much late 20th century writing on scientific creativity argues, lateral thinking and serendipity can be as productive as methodological rigour.

I began by giving examples. When in doubt, start with case studies to engage your audience. For example, a visual arts practitioner might contribute to new knowledge by developing an innovative printing technique; a poet might subvert forms to reflect the way in which we communicate online in the twenty-first century; a novelist conducting background research might discover a lost colonial play and highlight its cultural significance; or a dramatist might examine how the paratexts of a script enhance a play’s identity as theatre for social change. Researchers embed these discoveries in the creative project and, if a doctoral candidate, in the exegesis or critical essay so that the thesis forms an integrated whole. For creative artists in the academy, the dissemination of new knowledge can, therefore, take multiple forms. Aside from the creative artifact, traditional or non-traditional articles can contextualise it, just as exhibition catalogues, playbills or program notes can underpin research significance and impact, not to mention the requisite ERA statements.

Questions that practitioners ask about their relationship to their materials and craft might have seemed clear at the beginning of the research journey, or might only through its course reveal themselves. Sometimes creative artists feel buried under a mass of information collected during a long-term project; sorting through layers is part of the process of uncovering the essential core. But this, of course, takes time. Uncertainty or tenuousness does not negate creative work’s benefits. As so much late 20th century writing on scientific creativity argues, lateral thinking and serendipity can be as productive as methodological rigour. ‘Domain knowledge,’ accompanied by understanding of peers and precursors, is nevertheless compulsory in order for us to position ourselves. T S Eliot’s seminal essay, ‘Tradition and the Individual Talent,’ still makes a valid case for practitioners to be on speaking terms with the past.

No researcher wants capital ‘T’ theory to straitjacket their texts. But choosing the proper theory equates with finding the right toolkit. Theory does not mean chaining our intellects, but scaffolding our knowledge, allowing us to climb higher.

Since the Strand report (1998), scholars have been unpacking the manifold ways in which creative works can be research. Explaining the usefulness of questions to doctoral candidates not only keeps supervisors honest, but also keeps at the forefront of everyone’s mind why theory is unavoidable. Practice-led research is amorphous, an umbrella term like literary criticism. Defining the framework allows students to determine what methodology (and associated terminology) suits it. Often postgraduates will complain, ‘But I don’t want to use theory.’ Deleuze’s no-frill’s explanation of theory is an efficient rejoinder: ‘…a theory is exactly like a box of tools . . . It must be useful. It must function. And not for itself’ (Foucault and Deleuze, ‘Intellectuals and Power’ 1972). The phrase ‘no text is innocent’ reminds us that we always come to artistic works with preconceptions. No researcher wants capital ‘T’ theory to straitjacket their texts. But choosing the proper theory equates with finding the right toolkit. Theory does not mean chaining our intellects, but scaffolding our knowledge, allowing us to climb higher. We might even mix tools and terminologies in interdisciplinary projects. Frameworks help creative arts researchers to articulate the questions they need to ask and, as work progresses, those might be refined and sharpened, or indeed new questions might arise. ‘Blue skies’ or curiosity-driven scientists face similar challenges in articulating what they might discover. This is the practice-led research loop in action – the irregular rhythm of intellectual and creative engagement whereby pathways lead in more than one direction and where some might be abandoned.

In sum, creative artists make ‘original contributions to knowledge’ or culture, as the OECD definition suggests, by following a variety of routes leading to non-traditional and traditional research outcomes. That ‘creative systematic activity’ requires a framework and questions posed throughout the research cycle. Results must be disseminated in order to be useful to others in the intellectual and artistic community, which does not ask peer reviewers or examiners to apply the mercurial label of ‘excellence.’ Research projects should not close doors but open them, which does not require them to supply definitive answers. Finishing one book or series of paintings can mean, for writers or artists, that they have discovered what needs to be done next.

Jeri Kroll is Professor of English and Creative Writing at Flinders University. Recent books are ‘Old and New, Tried and Untried’: Creativity and Research in the 21st Century University (2016) and a verse novel, Vanishing Point, shortlisted for the 2015 Queensland Literary Awards and adapted for the stage in America.

More from this issue

More from this issue

Independent artists are faced with a challenging and transforming landscape that requires adaptive resilience in order to thrive creatively, today and in the future. How do we, as tertiary educators, empower and enable artists to build strong and flexible, professional contemporary art practices? To address this issue, my current research draws models of praxis from artist-run initiatives (ARI) in the Visual Arts industry, specifically from my experience as director of Boxcopy Contemporary Art Space.

By Su Baker, President, Australian Council of Deans and Directors of Creative Arts — Over 2 decades the creative art academic community has grown and matured as a sector - so have the questions of method and purpose of publically funded research, that influence the processes of evaluation. Discussions around impact and ‘end-user’ value is a live issue at the ARC and we look forward to the new thinking that will shortly emerge. The creative arts depend almost entirely on end-user experience, and the impact of these experiences aspire to have real and meaningful impact on peoples lives.
By Dr Jenny Wilson. DDCA’s Research officer Jenny Wilson caught up with Henk Borgdorff in Amsterdam in April 2016, hot on the heels of his recent speaking tour of European and UK universities, art and music schools, to find out more about artistic research and European experiences of the politics of art and higher education.
By Professor Graeme Sullivan Visual arts has no singular function because it can be called on to do just about anything. Arts’ usefulness is because it is edgeless and homeless—art is masterful at shape shifting and form fitting
By Professor Paul Draper and Professor Scott Harrison Communities of profession, the old academy and the new academy, intimately rub up against each other and while some research may still be considered ‘more equal’ than others for now – this evolving mix can only positively impact on the rise of artistic research, its acceptance in society and its measurement by governments and universities.
By Associate Professor Cheryl Stock AM — The narrative of knowledge is almost always underpinned by the cognitive but how we know the world is often through the experiential. Whilst we have moved a long way in redefining knowledge in research terms to include the processes and outcomes of our practices (artistic, creative, professional) and importantly have privileged the artist’s voice as the expert in this recasting of what a knowledge claim might look like, some art forms prove more problematic than others in this endeavour.
By Dr Danny Butt — During the 1990s and 2000s, as readers of NiTRO know well, an intensive debate took place among art and design academics as to whether their practices and those of their graduate students could be called research, and if so what “contribution to knowledge” might be made by the creative output, as distinct from the writing that has traditionally accompanied submissions in higher degrees in creative arts.
By Professor Margaret Sheil — On my last outing in an ACUADS conference, I was described by Flinders University’s Julian Meryick as the “artist’s ideal of a scientist… impatient with the reduction of everything down to short term utility.” So as I venture once again into the creative arts domain, I draw on a scientific analogy. The principle of chemical equilibrium refers to a system in which the rate of consumption of inputs is the same as that at which outputs are produced so that the system is in a stable state of consumption and production.
By Professor Ross Woodrow — The decision by the Australia Research Council (ARC) to achieve the long-mooted merging of the Higher Education Research Data Collection (HERDC) and the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) exercise by adeptly disappearing the HERDC has been welcomed by many discipline leaders, and not just those in the creative arts. With the inclusive ERA becoming the singular evaluation of research quality across Australia, there couldn’t be a better time to rethink the classification of research in universities.
By Associate Professor Robert Burke and Dr. Andrys Onsman — Criticism of the scientific methods of doing research has increasingly pointed out that all experimental research involves some sort of creative leap. In the performing arts such creative leaps are fundamental to artistry.
By Dr Leo Berkeley — The creative practice of filmmaking, understood as a form of academic research, has been growing in scale and significance within Australian universities for several years. While doctorates involving the making of a film have been occurring for decades, it is only relatively recently that the academic screen production community has been seeking to more systematically establish how the production of a film can lead to the discovery of new knowledge.
By Dr Jenny Wilson As many in creative arts grappled with the amalgamation challenges of the 90s, few were aware that the Dawkins reforms also had increased the centrality of research to university funding. This ‘blissful ignorance’ was not to last.
By Professor Brad Buckley and Associate Professor John Conomos — Recently, there has been much discussion in the press and beyond about the importance of Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) subjects at high school and at university. In particular, the Commonwealth Government’s National Innovation and Science Agenda has focused exclusively on STEM disciplines. However, that discussion misses the central importance of creativity, inventiveness and innovation.
By Dr Kate Tregloan and Professor Kit Wise — Interdisciplinarity has been widely recognised as a valuable response to the wicked problems of our time. The ability to collaborate across disciplinary boundaries brings together different perspectives and expertise, and allows entirely new approaches and solutions to emerge. To prepare students and graduates for the complex challenges of the twenty first century we need good quality interdisciplinary programs. But how do we know what is ‘good’?
By Professor Estelle Barrett and Professor Barbara Bolt — At a roundtable at the Australian Council of University Art Schools (ACUADS) annual conference in 2014, panelists were asked to address the following question: What impact are higher degree research programs having on emerging trends and themes in contemporary art? Whilst the panel felt that the development of higher degree research programs in creative arts did not lead to better “art” they did agree that it has profoundly affected the way art is framed and understood both within the academy and beyond.
By Professor Margaret Gardner AO — The Australian Government’s Federal Budget announcement in May was confirmation that funding for the Office for Learning and Teaching would be discontinued after this year. The news, though not unexpected, represented a blow to funding for teaching and learning scholarship in Australia.
By Dr Tim Cahill and Professor Julian Meyrick — ‘In God we trust. All others bring data,’ quipped US statistician, W. Edwards Deeming. As he implied, measurement is an inherently conservative occupation. Units of appraisal have to be agreed in advance, while the aim of measuring something is usually to compare it with something that already exists.

By Julie Hare There are a lot of things that happen in universities that the majority of the population don’t know about. Research is one of them. The average punter – even the average undergraduate – would have little idea as the scope, scale and importance of research that takes place. And having a scientist […]

By Lynn Churchill and Jill Franz, IDEA (Interior Design Interior Architecture Educator’s Association) — IDEA comprises 12 International Institutions providing a minimum four-year Bachelor degree in the disciplines of Interior Design (ID), Interior Architecture (IA) and Spatial Design (SD). Most include an Honours program and the opportunity to undertake further research in Masters and PhD programs in compliance with the object of IDEA - excellence in ID/IA/SD education and research. Academic Research is a significant requirement for most academics in these disciplines.
By Associate Professor Denise Ferris and Professor Marie Sierra, Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools (ACUADS) — The National Innovation and Science Agenda, launched in December 2015, has significant consequences for tertiary institutions, and in particular, for the art and design disciplines, as well as the broader arts, humanities and social science (HASS) fields.