NiTRO + Creative Matters

Perspectives on creative arts in higher education

All That Is Bad

by Ian Haig — The status of the Avant grade has now been systematized into what Dave Hickey calls the ‘therapeutic institution' – a self-propagating structure of academics, curators, critics and artists proclaiming arts goodness for the world.

Artists increasingly attempt to function as antibodies of the cultural bloodstream; paying lip service to the progressive attempt to ‘normalise’ and correct the social ‘body’ which has reached a peak in recent years. The more screwed the planet becomes the more the art world engages in the narrative of improvement to counteract and put things back in balance; contemporary art functioning as a kind of parental control to reign in the disobedient child.

Johanna Drucker recently took aim at the notion of artists on a mission of social improvement, stating: ‘The idea that the broken world could be fixed by fine art serving as the moral conscience of the culture and using a combination of intervention and provocation might be as ‘over’ as the tired recycling of formal and conceptual strategies from the inventory of contemporary art.’

From university research clusters on sustainability to curators exploring environmental issues, to artists engaged in identity politics, the idea of contemporary art and social virtue is nothing new but its rise is concurrent with the emergence of the artist PhD in Australia and the need to comply with ethics approval. My own university states: ‘Scholarly research activity has the potential to realise significant research and scientific gains, and to contribute enormously to human good’. It would seem contemporary art has slowly transformed from a cultural industry to a wellness industry.

With artists, curators, researchers, and institutions working away busily like worker drones in the name of goodness and ‘healthy art’, – why is it expected that contemporary art behaves in this manner when other modes of cultural production from movies to music are not expected to function in a therapeutic mode?

No doubt all this goodness in contemporary art is primarily about the perception of art having cultural value and worth which is clearly tied to political, funding and commercial agendas.

Historically we have moved from the cliché of the irrational, mad and obsessive artist to the new cliché of the contemporary artist who is well-balanced, responsible, articulate and rational. I am reminded by this every time I encounter art works of social virtue – what is this institutionally approved, curator validated and audience accepted work actually doing ? and what is at stake ? apart from producing a feedback loop of ‘goodness’ and a circle of worthiness between institution, curator, artist and the audience.

Artists taking on board ‘big issues’ and themes of social virtue in their work disturbingly functions as a kind of legitimization and validation of those practices; You are a serious and important artist because you are exploring serious and important themes. The world is in crisis and who you gonna call: the artists?

The art gallery after all functions like a hospital, the contemporary well lit clean white washed walls, the hushed silence, the silent, sterile, hygienic interiors, with their air of austerity. The modernist white cube studios of art schools are the teaching wards of the therapeutic institution. The aim of the art school; to produce, well balanced, healthy artists who will go onto making a healthy contribution to the art world and society.

With scheduled studio visits, clipboard in hand the staff identifies and diagnoses the problem and suggests a way to improve, before moving on to the next art school patient. It is called ‘practice’ after all, which like the general practitioner the artist and lecturer alike are invested in a therapeutic role with the mission of repair and correction.

What we really need however is art that is bad for you, that is wrong in its thinking, less Bob Geldof’s ‘feed the world’ and more Lux Interior of the Cramps. As Mike Kelley stated the only social function of art is ‘to fuck things up’ ‘to fuck things up for the pure pleasure of fucking them up’ where art’s currency is ‘purposeful purposelessness’.

What is needed is art that doesn’t look like art. I don’t want a didactic panel to explain the work and I certainly don’t need to see any more socially engaged practice of art that is all about raising peoples consciousness, or attempting to highlight the injustices of the world. This territory is well and truly covered. I want to take the conversation somewhere else.

References

FitzGerald, K. (2010) Volume: Writings on Graphic Design, Music, Art and Culture, Princeton University Press. p.164

Drucker, J. (2014) After After, The White Review

Kelley, M. (online video) on Art and Fucking Things Up

Ian Haig‘s practice refuses to accept that the low and the base level are devoid of value and cultural meaning. He is a senior Lecturer in the School of Art at RMIT University

More from this issue

More from this issue

By Su Baker, President, Australian Council of Deans and Directors of Creative Arts — In this issue of NiTRO we ask how well are we connecting the academy with artist practice outside the Citadel. How well are we preparing our students and how do we support our colleagues in their core career aspirations, that in most cases will be outside the university and educational context?
By Arun Sharma — Creative and performing arts disciplines are at an interesting juncture. After decades of concern about lack of funding, and about being sidelined in favour of the STEM disciplines, there may be some positive signals. The question is whether these disciplines are ready for the opportunities emerging from these signals.
By Dr Jenny Wilson — In his 1999 book, Art Subjects, Howard Singerman saw the university as ‘a crucial structuring site where artists and art worlds are mapped and reproduced'. University teaching, research and engagement agenda and the strategies that are adopted serve to enhance or restrict how its artists, staff and students, connect with and advance their genres and professions.
By Malcolm Gillies — Sitting on my shelf for the last eighteen years has been a copy of "The Strand Report". Dennis Strand's excellent work was for a project overseen by the Head of the Canberra School of Art, David Williams, and chaired by Peter Karmel, a leading economist and former vice-chancellor of the ANU. It was the first coordinated attempt to bring together the full range of visual and performing artists to address how they might better fit in with the developing research expectations of the National Unified System.
By Tamara Winikoff OAM — Earlier this year ArtsHub, published an article by National Association for the Visual Arts (NAVA) CEO Tamara Winikoff on the changes in art schools following the Dawkins amalgamations. It collated views and experiences of those currently working in the university sector and provides a useful starting point to consider how contemporary universities are influencing artistic practice. With the permission of NAVA and Arts Hub the article is republished below and has been updated by Tamara for NiTRO.
By Eileen Siddins and Ryan Daniel — As Bourdieu describes in his text ‘Firing Back’, the modern world has moved into a work situation dominated by employment precariousness, constant insecurity and downsizing to increase profits and therefore shareholder return. While artists have in general faced employment stresses for centuries, the impact of the broader economic move towards dominant players and markets is affecting the art world as well.
By Dr Sue Gillett — The current trend in Australian universities has seen the proportion of enrolments in Arts subjects declining over the last decade, with regional universities and campuses more significantly affected.
By Associate Professor Vanessa Tomlinson — The second Australia Percussion Gathering, directed by Associate Professor Vanessa Tomlinson alongside advisors Tom O'Kelly, Dr. Louise Devenish and Francois Combemorel was held at Queensland Conservatorium, Griffith University in July 2016. Sitting somewhere between a music festival, a conference and a music camp, the six day event brought together industry professionals, international guests, and an impressive 96% of all students studying percussion in tertiary institutions in Australia.
By Dr Peter Knight — The relationship between academia and artistic practice is in flux, and in my view that's one of the reasons why the space in which they meet is an exciting place to be working. I undertook two postgraduate degrees in music both of which had an emphasis on practice-based approaches.
By Professor Clive Barstow and Dr Jenny Wilson — On the eve of his 25th anniversary of his emigration to Australia, Jenny Wilson talks to artist and academic Clive Barstow about his reflections on arts education.
By Dr Linda Ludwig — The Symposium at the FHNW Academy of Art and Design in Basel – introduced by Carla Delfos from the European League of the Institutes of the Arts – brought together methodological reflections on research in the arts with recent activities from researchers in the field. It was goal of the Symposium to discuss how art and design generates knowledge that is of relevance to society.
By Professor Pamela Burnard — Why is it an imperative for arts institutions and academies to identify creative teaching in relation to creative learning as a vital way of addressing the politics of higher education? What is it about creative teaching in relation to creative learning that offers new priorities, new narratives, new forms of knowledge, new ways of ‘knowing how to speak' and ‘knowing how to hear' for creative teachers, artists and artist scholars?