Neuro-affirmative practices beyond tokenism: access and inclusion in Higher Degree Research

BY DIDA SUNDET, LYNDALL ADAMS AND JOANNE DICKSON — Neurodivergent (ND) and neurotypical brains function differently – both can achieve similar goals, but in unique ways. From seeing neurodivergence in a strictly deficit framework, we are slowly moving towards neuro-affirmative models in diagnostic and care practices where focus shifts from disability to neurological difference.

But areas like education, and specifically higher degree research, are still severely lacking in      appropriate support for neurological difference. Such environments may even enhance or manufacture disability. Rather than using a deficit or disorder model that tries to fix the neurodivergence, support is needed  that recognises and empowers unique strengths, caring for each person’s needs. Neurodivergence, as a term, includes a variety of conditions. This article comes from the perspective of an autistic ADHD (AuDHD) PhD student and supervisory team in a creative arts project.

Supervision as collaboration

High attention to detail. Creative problem solving. Hyperfocus. Expertise in favourite subjects. Creativity. Honesty. Pattern recognition. These are some of the strengths of the autistic brain. ADHD brains share many of the same traits. Seen through the lens of assets, many ND people are well suited to higher education. But universities are also unpredictable; sensorially overstimulating; and require complex social skills. They also operate with complex administrative processes and use language that requires a high level of decoding labour. Without adequate support it is an environment that could easily become disabling. 

Our success as a team relied on active listening, honest, direct communication, curiosity, and a collaborative working relationship in lieu of a traditional top-down hierarchy. In our initial meetings we discussed characteristics of AuDHD and clearly defined the areas of support-needs to be aware of.

The supervisory team was divided into two areas of expertise: visual arts and psychology. As the subject of the PhD was trauma-related and practice-led, the two disciplines were able to balance support of both the student and the project. Both supervisors actively dived into the PhD candidate’s drafts while Lyndall played the major role in studio research and administrative tasks. Joanne provided guidance on trauma and the mental health aspects of the project. 

Figure 1: Dida Sundet, Arachne (2024), photograph, inkjet print, 203, 3 cm x 135, 47 cm. Courtesy of the artist.

The project engaged with the myth of the ‘heroic’ rapist and feminist counter-media practices. Employing an interdisciplinary approach, the research focused on the connection between Greco-Roman mythology with current socio-political debates around men’s violence towards women and traditional gender stereotypes. It centred on re-coding women’s experiences of sexual violence in visual art and news media, exploring strategies for countering the myth of the ‘heroic’ rapist (Figures 1–4).

The convergence of autistic and ADHD traits presents a unique challenge, necessitating a holistic balance between predictability and novelty. The implementation of a consistent weekly framework from the principal supervisor, with clearly defined expectations, effectively addressed the need for routine. Every Monday: new work was to be sent; Tuesday: feedback was provided; and Wednesday: supervision meetings were held. Within this structure the student was free to work on either the studio or exegetical component, whichever had their current interest. The need for novelty was satisfied through accommodating a non-linear progress that facilitated an interdisciplinary visual arts project that played to their strengths in terms of varied outputs. This consistent framework allowed the student to flourish, as every week had a clear balance between predictability and freedom. Both supervisors were also hypervigilant in terms of burnout as the candidate indicated from the start that ‘I don’t know how to pace myself or when to stop when I get hyper fixated’. Earlier in their candidature the candidate had hit burnout which took months to recover from. 

Figure 2: Dida Sundet, Leda (2022), photograph, inkjet print, 203, 3 cm x 135, 47 cm. Courtesy of the artist.

It was acknowledged that the primary difficulties lay in navigating the administrative aspects of HDR, which necessitated immediate and hands-on support to mitigate anxiety and overwhelm. Literal thinking and executive dysfunction further complicated tasks such as form completion hence requiring more support in this area. This was effectively mitigated by pacing paperwork (one document per week), and by providing hands-on support in administrative tasks. Anecdotally the candidate realised what the principal supervisor was doing a few weeks into this process, with the candidate admitting that this had worked well: ‘because as soon as I realised, I tried to do more to get ahead of it, and immediately overwhelmed myself’. Reminding the candidate to stay focused on the one thing is key even though hyperfocus is part of the way they think. A clear plan and a way to assess where we were in the plan has also assisted in simplifying progress: ‘routine, but matched with novelty and creative freedom, that’s been held in really good balance, I think’. 

Figure 3: Dida Sundet, Rhea Silvia (2023), photograph, inkjet print, 203, 3 cm x 135, 47 cm. Courtesy of the artist.

Universal design for learning 

Doctoral studies are traditionally structured around an ‘imagined ideal student’ which has changed very little. Universities often promote concepts of access and inclusion through ‘reasonable adjustments’ (RA). In practice, these rely heavily on self-advocacy from the individual student, adding to the burden of simply functioning in an essentially disabling environment. RA’s often don’t extend beyond offering extra time on assessments, and often do not include any information on the disabilities of the student. The final oral examination, a critical component to completing the PhD at ECU, designed for the ‘ideal student’, clearly disadvantage many autistic students who may need additional context and processing time for questions and have a bigger need for clear and literal communication. 


Autistic students in particular have high drop-out rates from tertiary education with burnout, lack of awareness of their disability and adequate support being key issues.

Advocates for Universal Design for Learning (UDL) argue ‘barriers to learning are not, in fact, inherent in the capacities of learners, but instead arise in learners’ interactions with inflexible educational materials and methods’ (Rose & Myer, 2002, p. vi). In other words, it is the systems that need to change to accommodate a wider range of needs. Rose and Myer (2002) argue for separating academic outcome from process to accommodate for different learning styles, which would accommodate autistic bottom-up thinking and doing. Accommodations and changes to make the educational system inclusive would ultimately benefit everyone. 


Dida Sundet is a Norwegian interdisciplinary visual artist and PhD candidate, now based in Perth, Australia. Dida has focussed her career on feminist counter-media practices and exploring the complexities of sexual violence. Her work explores ways to intervene and re-contextualise cultural narratives and representations of women through a feminist gaze. Dida is a proud neurodivergent academic with an extensive background in visual and performing arts and has exhibited widely in Australia and overseas. USUNDET@our.ecu.edu.auc, Edith Cowan University, ORCiD id: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1869-5866 

Honorary Associate Professor Lyndall Adams is a contemporary artist and arts practice-led researcher drawing influences from the interface between post-structuralist and new materialist feminist thinking. Lyndall has participated in solo, collaborative and group exhibitions nationally and internationally and has published scholarly work on the role of ethical arts practice, public art, collaboration and interdisciplinarity, and creative research. Lyndall has supervised to completion over 30 research candidates winning the Vice-Chancellor’s Staff Awards for Excellence in Graduate Research Supervision in 2019 and 2022, and was awarded the ACUADS Lifelong Fellowship Award for 2024. l.adams@ecu.edu.au, Edith Cowan University,  ORCiD id: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4577-6609 

More from this issue

More from this issue

EDITED BY GUY KEULEMANS and SMILJANA GLISOVIC — The past decade has seen increasing attention placed on the inclusion of diversity in higher education, but evidence of actual progress from the academic and student experience seems less apparent than claims of intent made by university management.
BY NOAH MOON AND PETA MURRAY — Since RMIT's Creative Writing program began partnering with The Big Issue in 2022, three generations of first year students have had an opportunity to make their way into the world of creative nonfiction via dabblings in the memoiresque.
BY AMBER JANOWICZ AND DONNA MAZZA — Amber Janowicz's research project Epistles of the Body: Tracing Pre-Menstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD) through Feminist Waves and Personal Narratives, comes after twenty-five years of medical misdiagnosis and two decades battling to reach her higher education goals.
BY KATHERINE MOLINE, CHANTELLE BAISTOW AND SCOTT BROWN — This report contends that creating opportunities for students with neurodiversity in Australian Honours research training programs often draws from a history of progressive Euro American approaches to inclusive education.
BY KIM PERCY — For some of us, being creative is innate and many of us are driven by what Jill Orr refers to as a ‘need to create’ (Orr, J. 2024). As a sessional university lecturer, I have taught in visual art, photography, communication design, design media and professional art practice. During the last fifteen years, I have observed an increased proportion of students who have self-reported as neurodiverse.
BY DOREEN DONOVAN AND GUY KEULEMANS — Recent shifts to decolonise higher education curricula (Times Higher Education, 2025; Askland et al., 2022; Moss et al., 2022; Gopal, 2021; Muldoon, 2019), alongside strategic priorities of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) (Eaton, 2022; Salmi & D’Addio, 2020; Cumming et al., 2023) have coincided with calls to improve higher degree research (HDR) training in Australia.
BY ADRIAN HARRIS — Ata-foafoa ma fa’atinoga i le va o feso’otaiga fa’aleaganu’u: Fa’atinoga o tomai patino i totonu o nei feso’otaiga: Creative practice and the vā: Making meaning within intercultural relational spaces
BY BUJIKHAM BATMUNKH AND GUY KEULEMANS — The Mongolian yurt has evolved over centuries to accommodate nomadic people living year round in dynamic climates ranging from temperature as extreme as 40 degrees Celsius to minus 40 degrees Celsius.
BY WAJIHA PERVEZ — My favourite childhood memory is excitedly climbing onto my grandmother’s shoulders as she sat in her sewing corner, delicately stitching my clothes. It was her love language. She hand-stitched my clothes for every special occasion: birthdays, Eid, and my auntie’s wedding.
BY DAI TRANG NGUYEN — As a textile artist and international student from Vietnam, my journey in higher education has been a continuous process of weaving together cultural identity and creative exploration. Living far from home deepened my connection to my Eastern heritage, making it an inseparable thread in the fabric of my research.
BY AMELIA WALKER, HELEN GRIMMETT & ALI BLACK — The term ‘ludic inquiry’ indicates methods of pedagogy and research wherein playing games facilitates problem-posing and knowledge making. We recently shared the privilege and pleasure of co-editing a book where each of the diverse chapters uniquely apply ludic inquiry towards problems of power, privilege, and in/equity in higher education (Walker, Grimmett & Black 2025).
BY ANNE RYDEN — This piece discusses a teaching initiative that draws on the principles and values of the Indigenous methodology of yarning to bring into play the individual educational, cultural and personal experiences of a highly diverse cohort of students in a foundational postgraduate research methods unit.
BY ALY DE GROOT, AMANDA MORRIS, LARISSA PICKALLA AND LUCY STEWART — At Charles Darwin University (CDU), the Academy of the Arts (with campuses in Darwin and Alice Springs) is learning to work closely with First Nations communities, students, artists and educators.