Writing is both method and artefact, a movement through iterative spirals of reading, writing, thinking, breaking. Boyd’s methodology, rooted in Hofstadter’s self-reflexive loops, offers a structure for writing that resists linearity and embraces recursive motion and conceptual reintegration. The Anthropocene, as both geological reality and philosophical provocation, demands forms that are unstable, situated, and reflexive. Smelting responds to this demand through form and voice, rendering the paradoxes of human/nature binaries, and the institutional/self-boundaries porous. This article contributes to creative writing research by extending Boyd’s methodology into an Anthropocene context, demonstrating how recursive form itself generates knowledge about ecological entanglement and researcher identity. In doing so, it situates the writer as a researcher-in-the-making, whose methodological loops resist institutional linearity while opening new pathways for creative research.
Keywords Strange loops, anthropocene, creative writing, methodology, artefact and exegesis, creative practice research
DOI 10.65289/creativematters.2025.10.13
Simon-Peter Telford is a writer and researcher exploring creative writing’s role in health, existentialist fiction, and Anthropocene literature. Based at Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, his work examines narrative as healing, meaning-making, and ecological engagement. He is a published author and received his PhD from University of South Australia.