Two Steps Forward, Three Steps Back

We gauge the response from our students to see how we fared during the early days of the pandemic from their perspective. The student voice is essential in helping us reflect on this life changing moment in time, so we can better prepare for change as change becomes the new norm.

By Professor Clive Barstow

Welcome to the 29th edition of NiTRO at a time of great upheaval both in our society and within the higher education sector. In the previous edition we touched on the amazing efforts of our academics, professional and technical staff in our various institutions by transitioning our teaching and research to off-campus mode at such short notice and against all the odds.

In this edition, co-edited by Professor Su Baker, we gauge the response from our students to see how we fared during the early days of the pandemic from their perspective. A number of institutional student surveys tell us that our students are highly appreciative of the way in which we prioritised their continuing education, but in some cases, they also highlighted the vulnerability of our learning systems particularly in areas where studio-based teaching has been our modus operandi. The student voice is essential in helping us reflect on this life changing moment in time, so we can better prepare for change as change becomes the new norm.

While we appreciate the recently announced and much needed government support package for the arts industry, the proposed changes to University student fees affecting the arts and the humanities presents us all with a challenging future in terms of access to education that is meant to be equal for all. With a focus on short term recovery in employment in a post COVID-19 context, the proposed changes will undoubtedly have a long-term impact particularly on our marginalised, female and indigenous students who normally study the arts and humanities in great numbers as a way of understanding our past to contribute to a better and more equitable future in Australia. STEM and the Arts are not mutually exclusive and setting discipline against discipline through a funding model that incentivises the sciences by de-incentivising the humanities is illogical at a time when employers, businesses and our Universities are screaming for creative and critical thinkers as we head toward a more automated workforce.

The argument about current employment is not founded on facts, rather it paints a picture of future work that is dependent on STEM skills, when the pandemic has highlighted to everyone the importance of the core human traits of empathy and creativity, shared values that bind us as a community and give us hope as we reset our priorities about what it means to be human again. Future employment will depend on our creative graduates more than ever, so the current funding proposition seems to present a step backwards in our long-term goal of improving life for everyone, through a broad and forward-looking education system that offers equal opportunities for all.

At this stage the proposed changes in government funding to Universities suggests a relatively small increase to student contributions in the creative arts compared to some humanities subjects, but the principles and assumptions driving these changes affect us all. As more details emerge about our specific disciplines, NiTRO will make commentary on the facts of how this will play out for our institutions and our future students.

On a brighter note, the ARC have now published the revised FoR codes for research reporting in Australia, in response to the ANZSRC review: http://aria.stats.govt.nz/aria/#ClassificationView:uri=http://stats.govt.nz/cms/ClassificationVersion/d3TYSTsmz2uc8CY1

Most if not all of the recommendations submitted by the DDCA have been acted on. I would therefore like to thank everyone who has contributed to this important review and we hope that the new refinements and definitions will enable creative research to take a step forward as we advocate for the importance of creative practice-led research within our Universities. An overview of these changes for our sector is included in the News section of this edition.

So … two steps forward and three back. Everyone is suffering now and the arts and higher education sectors are not immune to the current situation and the probability of a looming recession in Australia. We must put all of this in perspective and focus on how the arts can give people hope where hope has been lost, how we can inform through a critical lens and how we can visualise a future when vision is most needed. I hope you enjoy this important edition of NiTRO.

Other recent news

Other related news

For many, 2022 has been a year of transition. Whether moving into new roles or university structures, new (or extended) forms of teaching and learning, different research and research training landscapes, not to mention refreshed national governance and priorities, many of our DDCA members will remember 2022 as the year where changes brought about by COVID-19 started to settle in.

Welcome to this penultimate edition of NiTRO for 2022, which has been expertly curated by Dr Alejandra Canales and her colleagues at The Australian Film, Television and Radio School (AFTRS).

Welcome to the latest edition of NiTRO. The clocks (for some) have moved forward, and I know many of us are looking forward to a well-earned summer break. But alas, there is still a lot to do before then!

Arts and culture in Australia is on the turn. We hope. Since the recent federal election, from which the Australian Labor Party came back into power after a 9-year hiatus, there has been a lot of “noise” about the potential of a real future for arts and culture. “New National Cultural Policy”, which is currently accepting submissions (the DDCA is collaborating on a submission with our colleagues at the Deans of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities – DASSH), is just one sign of the Federal Government's commitment to what many of us already know to be the lifeblood of

Welcome to the 42nd edition of NiTRO, which examines a broad range of approaches and viewpoints on the Creative Arts PhD, edited by David Cross and Jenny Wilson

Welcome to the 41st edition of NiTRO, our second for 2022. The pandemic is still very much with us as we are open up and international travel returns. Most students have returned to campus, yet classes continue to be plagued by high levels of absenteeism, and academics manage a range of hybrid approaches, a complex task in many artistic disciplines.