Perspectives on creative arts in higher education

NO ART

Guest edited by Jessica Carmody, Emma Livesey-Green and Sarah Mould

“Poetry is not a luxury. It is a vital necessity of our existence. It forms the quality of the light within which we predicate our hopes and dreams toward survival and change, first made into language, then into idea, then into more tangible action.” 

– Audre Lorde (1985) 

Art helps us understand our shared experiences, it helps us make meaning of our lives. Art fosters empathy and creates the possibility of imagining new futures together. A world without art is difficult to contemplate – perhaps because it is an impossible state of being in which  ‘culture becomes a function’ rather than a ‘communicative social act’ (Meyrick 2023, p. 261). But we offer this idea as a provocation. If culture is ‘an active site of democratic contestation and negotiation’ (O’Connor 2024, p. 21), then what does it mean if it were to be diminished? What are the consequences of the declining support for art education, research and practice?

Public concern around the status of the arts in Australia has certainly been mounting, from the availability of arts education in both schools and higher education, to arts research funding as well as funding for the arts more generally. The NAAE (2024) called for a serious review into the Job-Ready Graduates scheme, which they viewed as directly disadvantageous to creative arts students, particularly First Nations, LGBTQIA+, first-in-family, remote and regional, and low-income students. The scheme has drastically raised fees for the arts and humanities, and resulted in cuts across arts and humanities departments in Australian institutions. To date, the revision of the scheme is still pending. 

While students are being forcibly ‘soul-starved‘ (Macdonald 2025), it appears appetites have not been quashed. The National Arts Participation Survey (2023) revealed an increased desire for arts participation amongst the wider Australian community, particularly young Australians, as well as an acknowledgement of its positive impacts and the need for further funding. Artists provide a ‘slow, rigorous and open-ended… tolerance for uncertainty’ (Macdonald 2025) that allows us to find fact within fiction, realism within the abstract, and art as a common good and need, not as an industry. 

The entire system is under threat, and this issue of Creative Matters asks: why does it matter that art literacies and opportunities are diminishing and what can creative practice research in particular do about it? We want to hear from you – your dystopic, utopic and sober responses on how this state of things – pointing to a ‘no art’ society – affects you, community and society. 

Some possible areas of inquiry for this edition might be:

  • Examinations from creative practitioners and researchers about the state of art practice and art research in, and/or outside, academic institutions. 
  • Examples of why art matters.
  • Explorations/examples of creative practice and arts research as a force for advocacy and social change, including arts legislation, governance, community/public programming and outputs.
  • Explorations/examples of collaborative practice between artists, creative practitioners and other disciplines, such as STEM, as well as industry and community collaboration.
  • Understanding of critical threats to the arts and art research, including the influence of technology on creative practice.  
  • Creative submissions that imagine and interpret the notion of a world with ‘no art’. 
Pitch

We invite contributors to submit an initial pitch for critical and/or creative responses to the issue’s theme.

Pitches should include the contributor’s name, affiliation, proposed title, and a short biography. They should also include: 

  • A 300 word pitch on how you would like to approach this topic which includes the following: format; length; main conceptual concerns/approaches. You may include a creative sample of 1 page (of text and/or image); or 1 minute of audio/visual work. 

If accepted, final submissions can take the following forms:

  • Scholarly research paper (max 3000 words)
  • Prose fiction, creative non-fiction or related (max 3000 words) 
  • Poetry (max 80 lines or 500 words for prose poetry) + 750-1000 word research statement
  • Moving image / audio work (5-20 minutes) + 750-1000 word research statement
  • Visual images (5-10 images) + 750-1000 word research statement

Please discuss with us any alternatives to the above.

Peer Review

Pitches will be reviewed by the editorial team and those selected will be invited to make a full submission for publication. Review of the full submissions will take the form of a ‘dialogue’ which will be published alongside each submission.

The intention for this edition of Creative Matters is to make the relationship between editors, peer-reviewers and contributing researchers public. We do this to examine the unique ways of knowing, being and doing that happens within arts research, and to further contribute to the discussion on how creativity and knowledge generation can, and should be, a communal act. To frame peer-review in terms of a ‘dialogue’ is to show how creative practice research often poses questions and inspires creative-critical responses that further open up conversations and deeper inquiries. 

Peer-reviewers include members of the DDCA Board and esteemed colleagues.

READ MORE ABOUT OUR PEER-REVIEW APPROACH.

Editorial panel

The annual Creative Matters peer-reviewed edition for postgraduates is guest-edited by a team of four creative practice researchers in varying stages of their research training journey – second year, third year, recently submitted and recently graduated. This team is mentored by the Creative Matters Editor throughout the process. Review will be based on appropriateness to the theme and general guidelines, as well as scholarly contribution.

Eligibility

Submissions are accepted from current postgraduate candidates and early career researchers who have been confirmed within the last 18 months.

Key dates

Call for pitches – Monday 8 September 2025

Notification of Acceptance – Late November 2025

Full Submissions – Late January 2026

We do not accept work written and/or majorly produced by AI. If AI is used as part of your process, please declare this. 

Other recent news

Other related news

DDCA Webinar, 1-2pm AEST, Friday 9th October 2026 This webinar addresses this rich and important value of arts across the lifespan through the research of four leading researcher-practitioners. Emily Gann, whose Arts SA Ruby Award-winning Lullaby Project Australia has formed partnerships with organisations including Carnegie Hall, New York. Kamarra Bell-Wykes (Yagera/Butchulla), a theatre maker and arts specialist across professional, […]

The Australian Film, Television and Radio School’s (AFTRS) Digital Futures Summit 2026 – Regenerate – was an invitation to reimagine the screen and audio industries as living ecosystems. In this framing, regeneration is not merely about sustainability or resilience; it is about active restoration, ecological enhancement and systemic transformation. With this upcoming edition of Creative Matters, the AFTRS guest editorial team […]

The DDCA together with DASSH (Council of Deans of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities) made a submission to the National Cultural Policy review of Revive. Our submission recognised the important architecture of the existing 5 pillars that work to support First Nations First; A Place for Every Story; Centrality of the Artist; Strong Cultural Infrastructure; […]

The DDCA Awards are designed to acknowledge and celebrate outstanding contributions to creative arts, elevate and share best practice, and encourage and promote the next generation of creative arts leaders in research and education. The Awards promote diversity and recognise contributions and achievements by First Nations creatives, as well as early-, mid- and senior-career practitioners […]

ABSTRACT It has been widely noted that creative practice research agitates in positive ways certain attitudes, understandings and/or practices towards ‘knowledge’ and ‘research’ within the university context. Not only this, or partly because of this, creative practice research complicates established scholarly protocols of assessment and evaluation. This has been a topic of concern and debate […]

Recent national media coverage has highlighted significant and ongoing declines in Arts education and training across schools and universities. Fewer students are able to access Dance, Drama, Media Arts, Music and Visual Arts, and this has serious consequences for young people, for education, and for Australia’s cultural future. The National Advocates for Arts Education (NAAE) […]