The Politics of Creative Arts Action

The contemporary world faces an array of inter-connected daunting challenges - geopolitical, enviro-climatic, economic-developmental. While science and technology address many of them, their agenda is only half the story.

By Professor Tony Fry

The contemporary world faces an array of inter-connected daunting challenges – geopolitical, enviro-climatic, economic-developmental. While science and technology address many of them, their agenda is only half the story. The other half implies that in dealing with these challenges, a major cultural transformation of the modes of worldly occupation of our species is required – this immediately and in coming decades and centuries.

. . . creative practices are fundamentally political. For instance, in bringing things into existence in the world, Design can make human and biophysical conditions either better or worse. Thus design is ethically always ‘on the line’.

The Launceston-based but globally engaged ‘The Studio at the Edge of the World’ (www.thestudioattheedgeoftheworld.com) exists to make a contribution to meeting these challenges. In so doing it recognises that creative practices are fundamentally political. For instance, in bringing things into existence in the world, Design can make human and biophysical conditions either better or worse. Thus design is ethically always ‘on the line’.  Obviously this is a wider understanding of the political than just focussing on political ideologies, parties, and formal political processes.

The Studio practices its politics by combining transdisciplinary creative practices, education and overtly political projects. For example:  dealing with design and architecture education in the post-conflict environment of Colombia, which involves new curricula for new roles like the citizen designer and social architect; exploring how design can contribute to the world-wide crisis in refugee and interment camps and prisons; conceptualise new design and planning practices that can help prefigure the impact of sea level rises in the Pearl River of China and Nile Deltas and in so doing disseminate new knowledge.

Supporting this kind of work is working and designing with (in contrast to working for) universities and communities in the locations of the problem. Also part of the Studio practice is researching, and writing on, related problems of these areas of work, like the deepening geographic, cultural, and psychological condition of ‘unsettlement’, rapid urbanisation and informal settlement, and counter-conflict strategies in an age of asymmetrical warfare.

The learning events the Studio has conducted in Tasmania, in partnership with the Creative Exchange Institute, University of Tasmania, have been supported mostly by postgraduates, early and established career educators and practitioners, from the UK (University of Brighton, Goldsmith College), Egypt (German University in Cairo, UNDP Egypt), Colombia, New Zealand, Latvia, Hong Kong (Hong Kong Polytechnic University), USA (Harvard, New School NY, School of the Art Institute Chicago) as well as from many states of Australia.

Another major feature of the Studio centres on a critique of architecture and design education which educates for the present rather the future. Rather than prioritising industry and labour market needs, with social and environmentally sustainable design at the margins, the Studio acknowledges that in order to engage the unfolding complexity of future challenges, the creative practitioner of the future needs to have far more developed critical and analytical capabilities, high level research skills and a much broader and refined imagination.

The studio is not conventionally organised. It works with its global associates on some projects, its projects are about process not product and are kept open after the initially engaged task is completed. So for example, work on camps and prisons done in the Learning event of early 2017 will feed into a project on social architecture in the City of Ibague in Colombia in mid 2018 that will focus on the adaptive social use and retrofit of a historic abandoned prison. This approach very much centres on learning from where the problem is located. Another project based in Egypt provides another example. Often foreign educators are hired to bring ‘advanced’ design knowledge to further economic development, yet when applied, this can have disastrous consequences such as when generic solutions – for buildings, infrastructure, transport or waste management – displace more sustainable local practices. The Studio at the Edge of the World is current collaborating with the small number of Egyptian design educators who are aware of this dilemma, and are developing ways to understand, valorise, improve and adapt local sustainable practices, while integrating this knowledge into student learning.

Another major feature of the Studio centres on a critique of architecture and design education which educates for the present rather the future. Rather than prioritising industry and labour market needs, with social and environmentally sustainable design at the margins, the Studio acknowledges that in order to engage the unfolding complexity of future challenges, the creative practitioner of the future needs to have far more developed critical and analytical capabilities, high level research skills and a much broader and refined imagination. All these characteristics are brought to project initiation and leadership. The Studio at the Edge of the World is especially interested in increasing its partner relations with education institutions to facilitate this kind of activity still further.


Tony Fry is a design theorist, educator, writer and award-winning practitioner. He is an Adjunct Professor at the Creative Exchange Institute, University of Tasmania; Visiting Professor, University of Ibague, Colombia; and, Visiting Professor Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Tony has held many other visiting positions including at the School of the Art Institute, Chicago, the University of Cincinnati, and Goldsmith College, University of London. Tony has presented lectures at institutions in Europe, Asia, the Middle East, the Americas as well in Australia. He is the author of twelve books – his latest: Remaking Cities, was published by Bloomsbury in August 2017.

More from this issue

More from this issue

Professor Gary Foley was a key member of the Aboriginal Black Power Movement and a critical figure in establishing the Aboriginal Embassy protest of 1972. He has been at the centre of major political activities in Australia for more than 45 years. In 2011 and 2012 he created and performed his one man show Foley with Ilbijerri Theatre, Jon Hawkes and Edwina Howell, for the Melbourne Arts Festival and the Sydney Festival. In 2015 he was the recipient of the Australia Council’s Red Ochre Award for a lifetime achievement in the Arts.   Dr Edwina Howell has worked with Professor Foley

A bleaker aspect of writing for an intellectually self-conscious publication like NiTRO is the obligation to respond rationally to what are, in the end, irrational points of view.  As the political Right dissolves into its constituent pathologies, its policies transmogrify into a mix of prejudice and panic. . . This injects an air of unreality into the policy-making process.  “Data” is obsessively gathered, but selectively deployed.  Some areas of government expenditure must repeatedly account for their “impact”.  Others are judged of self-evident merit and anything that contradicts this is downplayed or ignored.

The DDCA’s 2017 conference took place at the Victorian College of the Arts during Melbourne’s recent respite from the cold weather - quite disconcerting for those of us from ‘up north’ who had dressed for the ‘polar extremes’ of our southern states. In a program designed to prompt discussion we welcomed a wide range of artists from within, and outside, academia to consider the theme ‘Beyond Research: Creative Arts in the Impact, Engagement and Innovative Agenda’.

There is a growing sense that something is happening in the arts and creative sector.  The sector is finding its collective voice at state, national and regional level, with terms such as ‘artist-led’, ‘artist-driven’, ‘sector-driven’ being used in the development of programs and policy. This visibility and attention to the arts and contribution of such to the sector does not appear to be similarly matched in education and learning realms.

A contingent part of the creative economy, tertiary creative arts education has a responsibility to its community of students, alumni and partners, to the broader arts sector and the political landscape that surrounds it. We are therefore subject not just to the politics of cultural policy pertaining to the arts, which affect the forms of support and types of arts forms and practices we include on our curricula, but to education and economic policies which shape the conditions under which we teach and undertake research.

The gradual shift from social democracy to neoliberalism in the west since the 1980s has significantly affected the apparatus of higher education. University and college heads have shifted their priorities from developing knowledge through education and research for social benefit, to increasing the wealth of the institution (and their own salaries) through competing for student numbers and positions in league tables.

In this edition of NiTRO our contributors consider the contemporary relationship between tertiary art and politics from the perspective of the role of art to engage with the political message, but also to explore how the political message, and political decisions that affect arts and education, are influencing tertiary arts.

In August 2017, I curated a week-long festival at the Sydney Conservatorium of Music and the Seymour Centre, University of Sydney, entitled “Out of the Shadows: rediscovering Jewish music and theatre”. This was the fourth of five festivals staged around the world, part of a large research project called Performing the Jewish Archive, funded by the British Arts & Humanities Research Council.  Together with ten colleagues from three other continents, the research focus was the aesthetic creations of Jewish artists in the 20th century, artists who were affected by persecution, flight and internment.

Academics convinced of the folly of user pays systems of education have long complained about the steady decline of equity resulting from the ratchetting effect applied to the HECS scheme since its introduction. This is compounded by the attendant impact on quality as each school and program must approach revenue neutrality through a combination of fees and research income.