Creative Arts Survey overview 2019-2021

In mid-2021 the DDCA commissioned Outside Opinion to undertake a snapshot of creative arts activity in Australian higher education between 2019 and 2021. Responses from organisations in five states provided valuable insights into enrolment trends and contextual factors affecting the creative arts programs.

By Professor Dennis Del Favero

In mid-2021 the DDCA commissioned Outside Opinion to undertake a snapshot of creative arts activity in Australian higher education between 2019 and 2021. Responses from organisations in five states provided valuable insights into enrolment trends and contextual factors affecting the creative arts programs. Publicly accessible data for creative arts in Australian higher education[1] was also utilised.

Context

The snapshot, and the impetus for this analysis, needs to be understood in the context of a long term contraction evident since 2014, which saw decline in performing and visual arts, modest growth in architecture and stronger growth in creative media and design. The intense pressure of the global pandemic in 2020 and 2021 intensified this trend and was compounded by ongoing legislative reforms and sustained reductions of creative arts staffing and infrastructure nationwide.

The survey responses indicated that creative programs fluctuated or declined in numbers, except for design and creative media

More nuanced responses to the legislation reform highlighted that the change was in direct contradiction of the government’s own research from 2019[2], in which the Department of Communications and the Arts found that creative skills were likely to experience relatively higher demand than routine tasks at risk of automation. The report particularly highlighted the employability of graduates with skills in the creative arts. The excellence, engagement and impact of the sector was underlined by continued growth in high quality ARC ERA ratings in 2018, higher numbers of ARC competitive grant outcomes during the period especially in industry collaborations, and growing numbers of creative arts programs in the QS top 100 international rankings.

This survey highlights the common challenges and opportunities across the sector that need to be harnessed to ensure strategic growth over the next decade … to be driven by closer collaboration between creative arts sectors and industries to address the underlying trends and respond to new currents as they emerge.

In June 2020, fee structures for Australian undergraduate education were overhauled, to direct students towards programs the government believed were more likely to get them a job. Combined with the rhetoric of legislative reform defunding the arts, this increase poses a significant further disincentive for prospective students.

Throughout 2020 and into 2021 creative arts departments across the country have been subject to a series of reviews, restructures and threatened or actual closures. Notable examples include closure of Monash University Centre for Theatre and Performance[3] and ongoing restructure of HASS and Creative Industries[4] at University of Newcastle.

Outside academia, the creative sector was excluded from support by government in the early stages of the COVID-19 lockdown as venues were closed and performances cancelled and overnight. Recent support has been widely publicised but comes in the wake of ongoing cuts to public funding for the arts and real terms disinvestment.[5] 

Challenges identified

The survey responses indicated that creative programs fluctuated or declined in numbers, except for design and creative media. The range of offerings decreased, as institutions closed programs with low and declining numbers. Significant decreases in international student enrolments in 2020 and 2021 were reported. The data show that actual enrolments fluctuated significantly between institutions and years. The relatively small number of responses means that the data is indicative of trends rather than necessarily representative of specific sectors.

Major trends were reported as follows:

  • Gradual but sustained decrease in enrolments in music and visual arts

  • Several creative programs discontinued following internal review by the University

  • Minimal growth in some programs driven by the closure of others

Factors were identified as contributing directly to these trends:

  • The rhetoric of job ready STEM graduates since 2014 turning students away from the arts

  • Institutional cost cutting targeting smaller and resource intensive courses

  • The closure of international borders, preventing international students from arriving

Opportunities proposed

To address these challenges the development of creative arts education and research in Australia can utilise the following opportunities:

  • Leveraging strong international rankings for creative arts building on excellence in teaching and research e.g. QS rankings evidencing high number of creative arts programs in top 100 internationally

  • Enhancing growth through programs and double degrees that attract cross faculty students & researchers e.g. creative media programs

  • Shifting to sustainable business model that focuses on targeted rather than open-ended growth e.g. market differentiation between local programs

  • Investing in leading collaboration with STEM in growth domains e.g. design, environment, health & digital technology

  • Growing engagement between programs and industries e.g. embedded research and training programs in training and innovation precincts

  • Building alliances between programs, industry and philanthropy to develop public support & investment in creative arts, leveraging the international high profile of Australian creatives and industry

While each institution may have slightly differing experiences and capacity to capitalise upon the opportunities presented, this survey highlights the common challenges and opportunities across the sector that need to be harnessed to ensure strategic growth over the next decade. Such growth will need to be driven by closer collaboration between creative arts sectors and industries to address the underlying trends and respond to new currents as they emerge.

Acknowledgement

Outside Opinion is a consultancy that specialises in strategic academic and research development in the humanities, social sciences and the arts. 

References

[1] https://www.dese.gov.au/higher-education-statistics/ucube-higher-education-data-cube

[2] https://www.arts.gov.au/publications/creative-skills-future-economy

[3] https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/oct/22/death-of-a-thousand-cuts-theatre-degree-closures-could-wipe-out-future-generations-of-australian-performers

[4] https://campusmorningmail.com.au/news/making-more-of-hass-and-creative-industries-at-uni-newcastle/

[5] https://www.artshub.com.au/news/news/whats-budget-2021-22-got-for-the-arts-262545-2370949/


Scientia Professor Dennis Del Favero is an Australian Research Council Laureate Fellow, Chair Professor of Digital Innovation at UNSW (Sydney, Australia); former Executive Director of the Australian Research Council | Humanities & Creative Arts; Executive Director of iCinema Centre for Interactive Cinema Research (iCinema); Visiting Professorial Fellow at IUAV University Venice; Senior Research Fellow at The University of California, Santa Barbara and Member of Editorial Committee of Quodlibet Studio Corpi. His collaborative research comprises work across art, humanities, engineering and science, exploring the unpredictable relationship between the human world and the earth using AI based creative visualisation systems.

More from this issue

More from this issue

As Editor of NiTRO I write a report for the DDCA board at the end of each year. This year, I want to share this five-year report with you.

The 2021 ACUADS Conference was developed in partnership with the DDCA to deliberately explore the theme of networks and their possibilities in response to the challenges and future agendas of the Tertiary Art, Design and Creative Arts sector. This partnership was itself a merging of networks, building upon many shared projects and instances of joint advocacy in recent years; a model and proof of concept for the value of further network building.

Professor Cat Hope considers the potential benefits of an Australian Academy of the Arts. She asks: “How do we get a voice to government on behalf of the broader creative arts community that incorporates the nexus of industry and education in the creative arts?” It’s an ACE question.

As Universities scramble to consider new economic models, we are entering into a deeply unstable transition between “what we did to survive during COVID”, and the “new normal”. During this period, changes that were rolled out during a global emergency, are becoming fate accompli. Unfortunately these decisions are occurring before we have had a chance to find out what post-COVID recovery looks like for our sector.

During the session ‘Ecosystems & Posthuman Networks’ ACUADS 2021 Kit Wise asked one of my panel peers: “The Makers Movement is such a powerful force, outside the academy. Do you see new opportunities for HE through a more porous approach to collaborative education? And has COVID impacted the Maker Movement, for better or worse?” I found this a profound question

We live in benighted times, of that no doubt. So, what better to lift our spirits as the UK absorbs the russet hues of autumn than to break open our brand-new brightly painted orange building here on the campus at Arts University Bournemouth.

In my blog, I wrote about the value of an arts education and the demise of creative subjects in UK secondary schools. I opened the blog reflecting on the history of the arts and sciences as partners in crime that co-existed in a symbiotic relationship – framed as “allies or enemies”

One of the themes explored in the recent ACUADS/DDCA conference was how best to connect arts education and research to STEM education and economic recovery in a post-pandemic world. From my own discipline of cognitive psychology there is considerable evidence that scientific and artistic creativity can be viewed as manifestations of the same underlying cognitive systems in the brain.

DDCA’s 2021 Forum was conducted in partnership with the annual conference of the Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools (ACUADS) and took place predominantly online. This edition of NiTRO captures and shares insights from this combined event.