NiTRO Creative Matters

Perspectives on creative arts in higher education

Diversity on and off screen in Australian film schools

By Dr Kath Dooley, Associate Professor Marsha Berry, Margaret McHugh, Professor Craig Batty and Professor James Verdon — In recent years, cultural movements such as #metoo and #OscarsSoWhite have drawn attention to low levels of diversity on screen and behind the camera in the global screen industries.

Local and national screen agencies in Australia and abroad have responded with the introduction of initiatives to boost participation by women and minority groups. The question of how gender equality and diversity more broadly – on and off screen – might be fostered is not just pertinent for these industry players, but also for post-secondary educators who seek to emulate industry standards and working conditions in screen production curricula. Unit coordinators and instructors might ask how they can develop more inclusive, ethical and sustainable educational practices in their screen production classrooms. This issue is what a recent Australian Screen Production Education and Research Association (ASPERA) report investigated.

Access to concrete data reporting the levels of diversity embodied within film school productions has been scarce. And so, in 2019, ASPERA commissioned a report into diversity on screen and behind the camera within Australian tertiary screen production curricula, focusing on capstone or culminating screen production units (i.e., major productions). Members of the ASPERA Research Subcommittee designed and conducted a survey that was completed by capstone unit instructors or coordinators at 17 universities and/or TEQSA accredited film schools. This called for the input of quantitative data into the gender identification of students across different production roles on student projects, as well as information about the diversity being reflected within characters portrayed in the work (focused on dimensions of gender, race, language, disability and sexual orientation).

While anecdotal evidence presented at previous ASPERA conferences suggested that production crew roles were gendered, and this is in line with broader screen industry trends, the ASPERA report confirmed this. As an example, the majority of student cinematographers are male. Moreover, the report found that the levels of diversity present within student projects is limited in terms of characters’ cultural background, principal language spoken, disability status, and their sexual orientation. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the principal character/subject of an Australian student film is mostly likely to be a white, able-bodied, straight male.

A second phase of the report showcased suggestions from instructors about how increasing levels of diversity on and off screen in student films might best be approached in the curriculum (via specific pedagogies) and through the student production process. Common themes across these responses suggested a need to make students aware of in-built prejudices, the inclusion of more diverse texts (scripts, films, theory books), overt curriculum design (e.g. the inclusion of specific workshops and assessment tasks to address diversity), and direct interventions in class activities (such as instructor selection of projects) to address diversity. These suggestions acknowledge the plurality of viewpoints in contemporary society and accentuate the ethical obligations of instructors to foster diversity in student storytelling. But what would this look like?

Making students aware of in-built prejudices might be achieved through classroom discussion or the use of tests to raise self-awareness. For example, the short Gapminder Test challenges students’ assumptions and erroneous beliefs in regard to global trends.

The inclusion of more diverse texts gives students exposure to a range of cultural experiences, but must also be accompanied by the presence of diverse figures in the classroom, such as guest industry practitioners who can serve as role models for students. Furthermore, one might question the diversity of educators themselves, particularly those designing screen production curriculum. Such an act draws attention to the profile of instructors tasked with the responsibility of developing students’ understandings of multiple knowledge systems.

Overt curriculum design and direct intervention in class activities can shape the way that student production teams are formed and the types of stories that are selected for development. While instructors can act as gatekeepers for the greenlighting of student productions, we acknowledge that student cohorts are fixed once enrolled, and therefore the diversity of teams is harder to negotiate. Current industry practice stresses the importance of authentic storytelling drawn from creators’ own experiences. This raises further questions for educators about how best to foster diverse stories from a cohort with limited diversity in terms of cultural background, language, disability and gender identity.

The data provided in the ASPERA report makes it clear that diversity on and off screen is not just an industry issue, but also a “pre-industry issue” (Keast 2020). The report lays the groundwork for further research and the introduction of applied measures to address diversity in screen production curricula going forward. Continued efforts on these fronts have the power to change future generations of storytellers’ assumptions about identity specifically, and cultural expression more broadly, for the better.


Dooley, K., McHugh, M. & Berry, M. (2020). Diversity on and off screen in Australian film schools. Australian Screen Production, Education and Research Association.

Gapminder. (2018). Gapminder Test.

Keast, J. (2020). ‘A pre-industry issue’: New report examines diversity on and off screen at film school. IF Magazine.

Dr Kath Dooley is a filmmaker and academic based at Curtin University in Perth, Western Australia. Her work as writer/director has screened at events such the Edinburgh International Film Festival and FIVARS, Toronto. Kath is author of Cinematic Virtual Reality: A Critical Study of 21st Century Approaches and Practices (Palgrave Macmillan, 2021) and co-editor of The Palgrave Handbook of Screen Production (2019). Kath is a member of the Australian Screen Production, Education and Research Association (ASPERA) Executive and Chair of their Research Subcommittee.

Associate Professor Marsha Berry is an artist and ethnographer based in the School of Media and Communication at RMIT University. She is author of Creating with Smartphones (2017, Palgrave Macmillan) and is co-editor of three volumes on screen media. She has published extensively in international journals such as New Media and Society and New Writing as well as in edited books. Her work has been exhibited Australia and internationally in galleries including the Directors Lounge in Berlin and the Queensland Centre of Photography.

Margaret McHugh is a documentary filmmaker, creative practice researcher and lecturer in Media Arts and Production at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS). She comes from an industry background working in film production, and film festival programming and marketing. As a practitioner, Margaret has directed, written and produced over 16 short video works. Her films have screened at more than 50 national and international film festivals including – Sydney Film Festival, Frameline: International LGBTQ Film Festival (San Francisco), imagineNATIVE Film + Media Arts Festival (Canada), Adelaide Film Festival, Berlin Independent Film Festiva, Queens World Film Festival (New York), Ethnografilm Festival (Paris), and Arte Internacional De Cine Y Arte – (Buenos Aires). She is a member of the ASPERA Research Sub-committee.

Professor Craig Batty is Dean of Research (Creative) at the University of South Australia. He is the author, co-author and editor of 15 books, including Script Development: Critical Approaches, Creative Practices, International Perspectives (2021), The Doctoral Experience: Student Stories from the Creative Arts and Humanities (2019), Writing for the Screen: Creative and Critical Approaches (2nd ed.) (2019) and Screen Production Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry (2018).

Professor James Verdon is Chair of the Department of Film and Animation at Swinburne University of Technology and teaches screen production and theory units there. He is also Chair of Swinburne’s NTRO committee and a member of the Research Centre for Transformative Media Technologies. James’ creative practice and research work spans moving image for theatre and museums, broadcast television, and experimental film. His screen work has been exhibited widely including at Leicester Square in London, Goethe-Institut in Berlin, Bangkok International Film Festival, National Gallery of Victoria, Australian Centre for the Moving Image, Melbourne Museum, Australian Centre for Photography, Centre for Contemporary Photography, and Melbourne Recital Centre.

More from this issue


By EO Gill — As COVID-19 corrodes our creative industries, I find myself scrambling to identify anything that might signal

Read More +
What’s the point?

By Dr Julia Prendergast — Jared Diamond asked the acclaimed evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr (1904-2005) why Aristotle didn’t come up

Read More +

More from this issue

By Alejandra Canales and Susan Danta — It is truly an honour and privilege to collaborate with NiTRO to co-edit an edition on the topic of Collaboration and Authorship. The ideas for this topic grow out of a lecture series within the capstone subject in the Master of Arts: Screen at Australian Film Television and Radio School (AFTRS).
By Associate Professor Sue Joseph — My first experience of a university ethics committee was as a candidate in the latter days of my doctorate, investigating voicelessness and the media. I was a new academic, teaching into the journalism school.
By Associate Professor Beata Batorowicz and Dr Linda Clark — Women-artists often encounter a “double-bind” which involves an irreconcilable social demand of being “too much or not enough” within their personal lives and professional careers (Catalyst 2007; Williams 2018). The pressures of juggling family responsibilities and career are further exacerbated by making this undertaking appear effortless, with this overall set up leading to never being “good enough.”
By Dr Karen Pearlman — Film industries have poor records of treatment, opportunities, and recognition of women (see Loist & Verhoeven 2019). The Screen Australia media release on Gender Matters of 15/10/2020 states that “we aren’t seeing enough meaningful change in the sector”. It calls for “cultural change” to address the gender equity issues in the screen industries.
By Pearl Tan — The push for diversity in many arenas is stronger than ever. In higher education, one way this can manifest, is in higher numbers of students from diverse backgrounds. With more diverse student cohorts, it’s certain that teachers will encounter students who are telling stories from cultures that we do not have lived experience of or are intimately familiar with.
By EO Gill — As COVID-19 corrodes our creative industries, I find myself scrambling to identify anything that might signal a brighter future. At the same time, I am wary of pandemic-born states of panic, since rapid-response initiatives often work to further disenfranchise already vulnerable members of the arts community.
By Dr Julia Prendergast — Jared Diamond asked the acclaimed evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr (1904-2005) why Aristotle didn’t come up with the theory of evolution. Mayr’s answer was “Frage stellen” which Diamond translates as “a way of asking questions [sic]” (Byrne 2013).
By Anna Tow and Deborah Turnbull Tillman — In a world where there is daily anxiety around the economy, our health and public engagement, we offer a pedagogy that promotes resilience, self-reliance and employability. As Collaborator, Deborah Turnbull Tillman is curator concerned with disrupting conventional process and situating her students as expert in their own practice rather than as subjects within hierarchical models of curating.
By Professor Stacy Holman Jones — Collaboration, authorship and preparing a new generation of storytellers who critically question and ethically engage with knowledge systems and representations is at the heart of a new minor in critical performance studies at Monash University.
By Associate Professor Cathy Henkel and Isabel Turner — Diverse and equitable representation, both on and off screen, is the subject of considerable debate in the screen industry sector. Screen Australia’s Seeing Ourselves report (2016) was a milestone study in representation on screen and prompted the formation of Screen Australia’s Equity and Inclusion Strategy and multiple state and industry initiatives to foster a culture of inclusive story-telling.
By Dr Romaine Moreton — Indigenous media production at the cultural interface is the ancient application of what is already known, an accumulation of knowledges gained through throughout millennia for the purpose of producing and reproducing Indigenous values of balance, harmony, and sustainability.
By Rowan Woods and Dr Duncan McLean — Film school programs are only useful to students and industry if attention is paid to the winds of change surrounding screen authorship.