NiTRO Creative Matters

Perspectives on creative arts in higher education

Art as extraordinary science: The place of art teaching in the science university

In their narratives of art education, Pevsner (1940) and Goldstein (1996) trace a complex history from the medieval guilds to the 20th Century art schools. This narrative is separate from that of mainstream education, since art schools are independent institutions answerable only to themselves.

By Dr Jenny Waller

In their narratives of art education, Pevsner (1940) and Goldstein (1996) trace a complex history from the medieval guilds to the 20th Century art schools. This narrative is separate from that of mainstream education, since art schools are independent institutions answerable only to themselves. 

In the 1970’s (in the UK) however, art becomes part of the mainstream university system, bringing its traditions with it. Risenhoover and Blackburn (1976) reflect the general hope that this will bring mutual benefits, with art departments benefiting from the relative stability of the universities, and the universities themselves benefiting from insights into “creativity and productivity…highly important matters regarding the creative side” (pp. 212-3). In the event, however, they find no evidence that the universities are becoming more creatively inclined – it is after all early days.

But forty years on, Macleod and Holdridge (2006) report that art teaching remains marginalised and vulnerable to hard issues of “academic probity…much is said about artists’ ignorance, their inability to write academic texts, to undertake comprehensive literature surveys of research terrain and to appropriately undertake research” (p. 7). Why have the great traditions of art education made so little impact?

In the case of art, this interdisciplinary disconnect is compounded by differences in the paradigms of education itself which, as we have seen, have historically developed independently of the universities.

According to science historian Thomas Kuhn ([1962]1970), academic disciplines inevitably struggle to understand each other because of the nature of what he calls “the fundamental unit of education” (p. 11), the paradigm. Paradigms are “constellation[s] of beliefs, values, techniques, and so on shared by the members of a given community” (p. 175) which are necessarily both invisible and incommensurable. So “schools guided by different paradigms are always slightly at cross-purposes” (p. 112). In the case of art, this interdisciplinary disconnect is compounded by differences in the paradigms of education itself which, as we have seen, have historically developed independently of the universities.

The Framework of Educational Assumptions below is designed to tease out our assumptions about education. The horizontal axis Articulation refers to the extent to which what we teach is articulated and in the public domain. The vertical axis, Acceptance by the University Disciplines, looks at the extent to which it is accepted as part of a recognised university discipline.

              Figure 1: The Framework of Educational Assumptions.

At the top right of the matrix is Normal Science (Kuhn, [1962]1970). This is the core business of the university where “the members of a scientific community …[are]… uniquely responsible for the pursuit of a set of shared goals, including the training of their successors” (p. 177). Normal science teaching and research is characterised by the familiar pedagogy of lectures, seminars and textbooks, designed to transfer knowledge as efficiently as possible.

At the top left is Professional Practice, where practical skills combine with the disciplines to form the professions. Teaching is about developing students’ personal competences through practice and reflection (Schön, [1983]2007). Professional practice is part of the university curriculum, although of lower status than purely theoretical studies.

The bottom right quadrant is where we find Kuhn’s ([1962]1970) Extraordinary Science, characterised by new ideas and experiments, the inspired intuitions of risk-taking individualists responsible for scientific breakthroughs. Kuhn notes that extraordinary science is not taught by the universities, even though the future of science clearly depends on it.

Finally, the bottom left quadrant Voodoo is where knowledge is both unarticulated and outside the authority of the disciplines. In university terms, this is the disqualified universe which includes “religion, metaphysics, intuitions, a sense of humour, imagination” (Feyerabend, 1975, p. 19).

Research into studio art teaching today shows that the contemporary paradigm is of art as extraordinary science, with artists encouraged to imagine and articulate new ways of seeing the world, just as experimental scientists would.

From the matrix, we can see how mainstream university teaching is restricted to the top two quadrants. However the historical paradigms of art education involve all four, with different emphases at different times. Research into studio art teaching today shows that the contemporary paradigm is of art as extraordinary science, with artists encouraged to imagine and articulate new ways of seeing the world, just as experimental scientists would (Waller, 2016).

So the area of science teaching’s vulnerability, its failure to teach innovation, is precisely where art teachers have experience and competence. We would argue that moving art schools into the university system did indeed bring with it the potential for showing how to teach for extraordinary science, and that the exploitation of this potential is long overdue.


References

Goldstein, C. (1996). Teaching art: Academies and schools from Vasari to Albers. Cambridge University Press.

Kuhn, T. S. ([1962]1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

Macleod, K., and Holdridge, L. (2006). Introduction. In K. Macleod and L. Holdridge (Eds.), Thinking through art: Reflections on art as research (pp.1-15). Routledge.

Pevsner, N. (1940). Academies of art past and present. Cambridge University Press.

Risenhoover, M., and Blackburn, R. T. (1976). Artists as professors. University of Illinois Press.

Schön, D. ([1983]2007). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Ashgate Publishing Limited.

Waller, 2016. Art as extraordinary science. Clink Street Publishing.


Jenny Waller’s career has been in teaching and training in the field of clear communications. She recently completed her PhD on the problem of how to explain Fine Art studio education in the context of university teaching, spending a year observing studio teaching and using discourse analysis to understand both what art teachers teach and how they do it. This research led to the publication in 2016 of her book Art as Extraordinary Science which argues that science departments could learn a lot from art teachers about enabling students to develop and test the new knowledge essential for the future of their disciplines.

More from this issue

More from this issue

Call for Artists Closes: 3 July 2017Event: 19 – 23 February 2018Event Location: Brisbane, AustraliaWebsite: Link | Link APAM is Australia’s leading internationally focused industry event for contemporary performing arts – with a key focus on increasing international and national touring outcomes and business development opportunities for the sector. The event, which will be held in Brisbane in […]

Dr Jenny Wilson — 2016 was a year of discussion and consultation on the future of higher education.  Yet despite all the effort and a flurry of statements reinforcing the Australian government’s preferences, actual detail on how these will be implemented is trickling out at best with much still being debated.
By Professor Su Baker, President, Australian Council of Deans and Directors of Creative Arts — With a quick scan of the status of higher arts education around the country, and indeed the world, we see some hopeful signs and many looming dangers and this allows for flights of fancy and doses of reality.

Project Anywhere was conceived as one possible response to these distinct yet interrelated challenges. Project Anywhere is a global exhibition model in which the role of curator is replaced with the type of peer review model typically endorsed by a refereed journal

When I first enrolled at university to study music, I never doubted for a moment I would find a career when I finished. It was the halcyon days of the late 1960s, there was full employment in most parts of Australia, and an expanding appetite for the arts, fuelled as arts councils and arts centres came into being. I wanted to teach music, and with a rapidly expanding schools system crying out for teachers of any subject, recruiting even those had not graduated, professional employment in my field was a certainty.

Within the increasingly neo-liberalist world there is an obsession with numerical data to enable governments, businesses, NGOs and learning institutions to tell a story about value and impact of spending monies, both public and private. Such data is converted into easily communicated percentages, budget lines or graphs to demonstrate return on investment (ROI). Goldbard (2015) refers to this practice as ‘Datastan XE "Datastan"

By Professor Laurene Vaughan — For some time now I have been focused on a series of questions about the future of the university and what value it brings to the world now and for the future.

...when government funding has been used to found a cloistered institution, as in the case of academic research, and this is overlaid with a thick coating of market logic, at some point someone will ask, ‘what are you actually doing over there?’