Practice: The Borders Project

LINDA LUKE

The BORDERS project was inspired by revitalising connections between practicing artists residing on either side of the Dhungala (Murray River). This was to address some of the disconnect between communities, as a result and impact of the 2020/ 21 Covid-19 lockdowns.

Borders is a cross-disciplinary arts project. It is an initiative by Arts Mildura, produced by Regenerative Communities, supported by the Regional Arts Fund Recovery Boost—Renewal Grant Program*. The project is a practice-led process using the provocation of the word ‘border’. This encouraged discussions about political human-centric borders, and questions such as:

Do rivers have borders? How do we experience borders of self? Where do we begin and end? Micro, shifting, ephemeral and transitional borders were all part of the investigation as well.

Underpinning this is the great Dhungala (Murray River) and the pertinent question of how, through art-making and performance, can we bring more awareness and responsibility to improve the health of this mighty river.

BORDERS is a three year project  which unfolds across four cross-border communities; Albury/Wodonga, Echuca/Moama, Swan Hill/ Speewa and the Mildura region. By April 2024, we will have completed seven three-day on-site laboratories along the Murray; a ten-day residency at GreenHouse National Artist Residency centre in Albury; twelve online artist-led practice zoom sessions; an informal public exhibition/ performance event in each location, and a concluding three-day exhibition, forum and performance event in Mildura (April 2024). 

The BORDERS team are – Creative producer Rhae Kendrigan; cultural advisor and Wergaia, Wamba Wamba and Nyeri Nyeri man, Mark Grist; practice-led facilitators Linda Luke and Peter Fraser; ecologist Craig Dunne; and project mentor Vic McEwan (Artistic Director, The Cad Factory).

I’m a choreographer, performer and researcher and I was invited to assist in conceiving of and co-facilitating – with long-time performance collaborator Peter Fraser – the practice-led labs for the project. Both Peter and my dance practice is grounded in Body Weather, a methodology originally developed by Japanese dancer and choreographer Min Tanaka.

Body Weather is not so interested in form, but rather, it is interested in ‘being’ and being ‘moved’ by the interconnections of the environment outside the ‘borders’ of who and what we think we are. 

Performer: Peter Fraser. Photographer: Martin Fox

Dr Peter Snow, who has written extensively on Body Weather explains:

‘Bodies are not to be seen as independent, singular, sealed off, coherent, stable, unchanging, and ordered; but rather as in process, open, multiple, changing, vulnerable, permeable, maybe dis-ordered, and perhaps even dis-organised. Bodies are vibrating, provisional, able to be manipulated, and subject to constant and ceaseless change.’

(Snow, P, 2003)

Over my twenty years practicing Body Weather, it has taught me to perceive our bodies as unique ecosystems that are shaped by the environments they reside in. Body Weather is first and foremost a training for dancers, however, my practical research also lies in facilitating processes with artists from other disciplines. The BORDERS project has attracted visual artists, curators, performers, singers and musicians who are interested in exploring the environment via a direct relational experience from within their bodies. 

The length and breadth of this project has prompted Peter and I to ask deeper questions in regards to our role as facilitators of the labs. For example, how to best facilitate a group of multi-disciplinary, multi-generational artists? What activities from the Body Weather’s vast compendium would serve such a group? How can we plan and yet remain responsive and open to changing tact along the way? Early on, we identified three main areas in which to construct the labs.


TUNING IN: A series of activities designed to heighten awareness of sensations, deepen sensitivity in the body, and shift the everyday way we perceive the world and ourselves. 

EMBODIED / BECOMING: a series of activities in the natural environment that encourage an experience of embodying non-human elements. 

CONSOLIDATING: Reflections, writing, discussions and (independent) art-making.

Group photo: blindfolds created by Borders artists Rhonda and David McTaggart. Photographer: Martin Fox.

This article is too short to delve into the many extraordinary discoveries that have unfolded during these laboratories, however, I will share one insight that generated a lot of discussion, in regards to the idea of leadership and responsibility. 

In many Body Weather activities, there is a ‘leader’ and a ‘follower’. For example, in one activity the ‘follower’ wraps the end of a long length of red cotton on their forefinger and closes their eyes. The ‘leader’ holds the opposite end of the cotton and gently guides them through space. The idea is to maintain tension in the cotton between the partners, and for the follower to only unfold the body from where it is being pulled (ie from the finger joint first, to the wrist, shoulder joint, spine, etc).  Both leading and following can be challenging. The leader needs to lead with clear directives and the follower needs to ‘give up’ (to some degree) their own agency and try to honestly follow what is given, in other words, to not interpret or add additional movement. People soon discover that this activity is not about a power relationship, but rather a symbiotic one. The leader cannot go ‘faster’ than the follower is able to follow truthfully. Both are responsible to pay deep attention to every tiny moment in order for the follower to experience the subtle unfolding of layers within their body. Effectively, the leader is there to serve the follower. It may sound simple in writing but the doing of this asks a great deal of trust from the participants, and judging from their feedback, this process engendered feelings of trust, intimacy, vulnerability, responsibility and connection. As a group, we wondered how this idea of leading and following could be used in listening to country more deeply?

The Borders Project has been rich, stimulating and challenging. Rich and stimulating because of the extraordinary and diverse range of artists who have been involved along the way. It is challenging in in regards to how to hold meaningful space for artists over a long period of time (three years) and distance (from Mildura to Albury and back again). I think this is a direct reflection of this enormous expansive country we call Australia. In November 2023, we head to Echuca/ Moama and then onto Swan Hill/ Speewa working with artists on creative responses to place from an embodied experience. In April 2024, we will invite all the artists who have joined the project to contribute to the final public event in Mildura which will culminate with performances, talks by artists and scientists, an exhibition and exceptional food and lively exchange.


Weblinkhttps://regenerativecommunities.com.au/borders/

References

Snow, Peter (2003), P4; Performance Making in Alice, About Performance: Body Weather in Central Australia, edition 5, University of Sydney.


Linda Luke is a lecturer for the Performance and Theatre discipline at the University of Wollongong. Linda has worked across multiple platforms in the performing arts for over 20 years: as a performer, choreographer and director. In her practice-led research, she aims to deepen sensitivity in our bodies and excavate the subtler undercurrents we experience in relation to self, each other and the external environment. Linda explores ideas around diminishing the ‘human-centric’ focus in dance-performance and instead explores how to foreground the rich diversity of non-human elements that exist in our environment. www.lindaluke.com.au

Main image credit: Artists (left, clockwise) Rhonda McTaggart, Linda Luke, Nicola Lambert, Peter Fraser, David McTaggart. Artwork (centre) by Maggie Ellis. By the tree (right): Peter Fraser. Photographer: Rhae Kendrigan.

*The Australian Government’s Regional Arts Fund is provided through Regional Arts Australia, administered in Victoria by Regional Arts Victoria.

More from this issue

Artists in academia

BY BEATA BATOROWICZ — provocations on traversing research and industry success within creative practice.

The ‘tension’ between industry and

Read More +

More from this issue

BY SMILJANA GLISOVIC — On August 9, 2024 the DDCA held a National Forum to generate discussion on the shape of the future of creative practice research in Australia (and beyond). The particular focus of the event was on research evaluation and assessment, chosen because of the current reviews of ERA (Excellence in Research for Australia).
BY MIA LINDGREN — I asked AI to give me a list of words including the prefix ‘non’: non-profit, non-negotiable, non-essential and so on. The non prefix is used to indicate the opposite, absence or exclusion of the root words, meaning it signals a deviation from the standard, typical or expected.
BY JESSICA WILKINSON — In the ERA 2018 exercise I was invited to be an assessor for the Creative Writing field. Of the five universities assigned to me for assessment of submissions within this code, I encountered wildly different approaches to how each university collated the 'top 30%' of representative samples.
BY BEATA BATOROWICZ — provocations on traversing research and industry success within creative practice. The ‘tension’ between industry and academia, in addition to having diverse roles within the broader creative arts research ecology of development and contribution, also describes an interconnectedness: they both feed into each other in building notions of success.
BY CRAIG BATTY — Do we agree on what we are looking for in research assessment in creative disciplines? As a DASSH survey in 2018 revealed, assessors (at least those surveyed) had mixed views about what was important – from theoretical contributions, to industry contributions, to hybrid contributions, and so on – the caveat ‘it depends’ came up strongly.
BY DAVID CROSS — Oh, to be world standard. To have reached the peak of global creative practice. To have left behind the parochialism of local concerns and made it in the places, contexts and ruthlessly competitive environments that truly matter.
Thank you to all that so generously and respectfully contributed to the conversation on the day of the National Online Forum, both ‘on mic’ and in ‘the chat’. The contributions in the below text are not assigned to individuals but rather the general threads and themes are summarised. For more nuance (and less unintended interpretive valence from me) I do encourage you to watch the recording of the forum here.
BY JULIA PRENDERGAST and JEN WEBB — Let us begin by introducing ourselves: we are Associate Professor Julia Prendergast, AAWP President/Chair, and Distinguished Professor Jen Webb, AAWP Treasurer – accepting the invitation to contribute on behalf of the Australasian Association of Writing Programs (AAWP), the peak academic body representing the discipline of creative writing (Australasia).
BY VERONIKA KELLY and CHARLES ROBB for ACUADS — The Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools (ACUADS) is the nation’s peak organisation representing the interests of art and design schools within Australian higher education. Here, ACUADS draws attention to issues surrounding the interpretation and positioning of ‘world standard’ in creative practice research.
BY SUSAN KERRIGAN for ASPERA — Australian Screen Production Education and Australian Screen Production Education and Research Association (ASPERA) has contributed greatly to the creation and assessment of Creative Practice Research (CPR) in Screen Production disciplines. This work began with the creation of the peak disciplinary body two decades ago, at that time only one person in the gathering held a PhD and was considered to be a legitimate researcher by the academy.
BY CHARLES ROBB — When news broke that Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) 2023 had been cancelled, a palpable wave of relief swept through Australian universities – no more laborious compilation of packages, impact statements, and ranking spreadsheets.
BY CAT HOPE — Despite an increasing number of artist scholars in the performing arts – those who have higher degree qualifications featuring the creative project/ exegesis model – are being employed in universities, it seems as if scholarly recognition for the so called ‘non traditional research output’ (NTRO) is in decline.
BY SMILJANA GLISOVIC and CRAIG BATTY — The discussion amongst colleagues at the DDCA National Forum on evaluation and assessment of creative practice research – where more than 100 from a range of disciplines were in attendance – was informed, considered and encouraging.
BY ANDREA RASSELL and JO POLLITT — In thinking about the development of a standardisation of assessment of creative research, we, as interdisciplinary artist scholars practising respectively in filmmaking/media and choreographic writing/dance/feminist environmental humanities, are constantly reforming our identities as researchers and artists.
GUEST EDITOR JANE W. DAVIDSON — Extreme weather events have been experienced in so-called Australia for millennia. This settler painting shows the terror and chaos captured by William Strutt in a depiction of Black Thursday, February 6th 1851 (painted in 1864 and now part of the State Library of Victoria’s Pictures Collection). From records of the time, around five million hectares burnt, which amounts to a staggering quarter of Victoria, and on the same day, with temperatures over 43 degrees Celsius in the shade, large swathes of western Tasmania also burnt.
BY CLAIRE HOOKER and ANNA KENNEDY-BORISSOW — It is well recognised that one of the hallmarks of climate change is an increase in the frequency and severity of disasters (IPCC, 2023). The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR, 2007) defines disasters as a ‘serious disruption of the functioning of a community or a society,’ and these disruptions result from interactions between hazards and human systems (Peek et al., 2021; Perry, 2018).
BY SUSANNE THUROW, HELENA GREHAN AND JANE W. DAVIDSON — In this short paper, we aim to explore the potential role creative arts might play in fostering community preparedness in view of the increasing extreme weather scenarios playing out across the globe.
BY PETA TAIT — This article outlines ARC funded research about the representation of ecological damage and climate change in Australian drama, theatre and contemporary performance. The project summary is followed by a brief discussion of artistic depictions of fire and disaster that refers to a community-based play based on the lived experience of its audience, and a performative work in which participants rehearse for a future disaster.
BY SARAH WOODLAND AND LINDA HASSALL — The escalation of ecological crises and climate-related disasters is impacting individual health and community wellbeing globally. The World Health Organization has highlighted that 3.6 billion people now live in regions highly susceptible to climate change, and the health impacts will cost economies US$2-4 billion per year by 2030 (WHO 2023).
BY BELINDA SMAILL — This essay explores how screen aesthetics have been deployed in our new era of fire. In Australia this era is marked by Black Saturday in 2007 and the Black Summer fires of 219/20. As both public knowledge and fire events have evolved the filmmaking community has responded with a largely documentary focused body of work. Examining this new turn in film and television’s narrative and visual interest in fire, I couch this study within Australia’s cinematic history of fire, recognising its intersection with the environmental history of fire and this new phase: the Pyrocene.