NiTRO Creative Matters

Perspectives on creative arts in higher education

Perspectives of Artistic Research in Music

96 Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;} table.MsoTableGrid {mso-style-name:"Table Grid"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-priority:39; mso-style-unhide:no; border:solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt:solid windowtext .5pt; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-border-insideh:.5pt solid windowtext; mso-border-insidev:.5pt solid windowtext; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;} Internationally, a great deal of effort and discourse has propelled artistic research in music into new areas of academic authority, authenticity and autonomy. Borgdorff, de Ruiter, Nettle and Pressing have all championed performance and practice-based research as legitimate ways for creating new and innovative music. Concurrent with the development of experimentation in music has come the legitimisation of making music as research.

By Associate Professor Robert Burke and Dr. Andrys Onsman

Criticism of the scientific methods of doing research has increasingly pointed out that all experimental research involves some sort of creative leap. In the performing arts such creative leaps are fundamental to artistry . . .

Internationally, a great deal of effort and discourse has propelled artistic research in music into new areas of academic authority, authenticity and autonomy. Borgdorff, de Ruiter, Nettle and Pressing have all championed performance and practice-based research as legitimate ways for creating new and innovative music. Concurrent with the development of experimentation in music has come the legitimisation of making music as research. Interestingly, criticism of the scientific methods of doing research has increasingly pointed out that all experimental research involves some sort of creative leap. In the performing arts such creative leaps are fundamental to artistry but at the same time extremely difficult to evaluate using traditional quantitative methodologies.

In 2015 we convened a symposium to learn more about artistic research in contemporary Australian music practice and scholarship. Our initial idea was to assemble the leading proponents of artistic research in music to discuss what we were doing, what we were thinking and where we were heading in terms of our research. We wanted to identify what we had in common and where we diverged. The commonalities we anticipated would provide the basis for a joint positioning. The divergences we hoped would provide directions for future development. Our aim was to collect the presentations into an edited volume that would serve a dissemination purpose. All these aspects have been or are in the process of being realised.

For those of us who came into academia after substantial careers in music, the move necessitated new ways of approaching how we experimented, and analysed our performance and composition. Our previous ‘evaluation process’, in which our creative output was evaluated by ourselves, our peers, our critics and our audiences – all people we had direct and immediate contact with and whose feedback had direct and immediate influence on our practice –  shifted to one with ingrained systems of research evaluation and accreditation. It is hardly surprising then that the accommodation of conservatoriums and schools of music into universities has not been without contestation and dispute. Academics who come from and continue to work in the music industry are caught between needing to satisfy the demands of academically acceptable research and their needs as creative artists. At the forefront of these issues is the question of what constitutes legitimate research.

The question of where artistic research in music sits in the academy in terms of legitimacy and status of outcomes was predominant in the symposium presentations. The majority of presenters were both academics and practitioners; they discussed and questioned how their artistic output might be considered as research outcomes. Another issue was the way practitioners might best go about observing, articulating and analysing specific aspects and factors of their performance or composition, and how such analyses might be synthesised into coherent and cohesive theoretical frameworks that other artistic researchers may access and utilise.

. . . by taking an insider’s perspective, the research comes from the creators of music. It is subjective and exists in a space that includes the researcher’s practice as a musician, as well as the analysis of a particular performance, composition or musical event.

The symposium had a number of important outcomes. In the first instance it provided an opportunity for the leading practitioners of artistic research in music to articulate both their current practice and their future potentials in a congress of like-minded people. Participants agreed that the opportunity to discuss the issues that were central to their own self-conception as performing musicians and composers in an academic environment afforded them the opportunity to speak freely and purposefully. The process of collecting papers into an edited volume, and the conversations between authors, editors and publishers allowed presenters to develop ideas and re-consider their presentations in consequence to the discussion they generated in the symposium. This is central to the edited volume to be published internationally by Lexington (Rowman & Littlefield) in 2017. The core focus of the book is that by taking an insider’s perspective, the research comes from the creators of music. It is subjective and exists in a space that includes the researcher’s practice as a musician, as well as the analysis of a particular performance, composition or musical event. Through presentations at major conferences in the UK and Czech Republic, we have been able to share Australian perspectives of artistic research in music. The symposium and the book make substantial contributions to the development and understanding of artistic research in music both in Australia and overseas.

Download the Perspectives on Artistic Research in Music symposium program

 

Dr Andrys Onsman (University of Melbourne) is a music educator and performer. Highlights of his teaching include working with young disenfranchised Aboriginal children, allowing them to perform on stages around the country. As a commentator on music, Andrys’ work has appeared in the mainstream media including newspapers and magazines, as well as in a wide array of social media, including CD liner notes and program notes. Academically, his research output in the area of artistic research and non-literal language communication is substantial: according to Scholar Google, his academic papers have been cited more than 500 times. He has PhDs in Cognitive Psychology and in Aboriginal Studies.

Associate Professor Robert Burke (Monash University) established Jazz and Popular music at Monash University in 2002. From 2011 – 2014 he served as head at the Sir Zelman Cowen School of Music (Monash University). An improvising musician, Rob has performed and composed on over 200 CDs and has toured extensively throughout Australia, Asia, Europe, Brazil and the USA. He has also released 11 CDs under his own name performing/recording with seminal international jazz artists such as Dave Douglas, Enrico Rava, George Lewis, Kenny Werner, Hermeto Pascoal, George Garzone, Ben Monder, Mark Helias and Australian musicians Paul Grabowsky and Tony Gould. Rob’s area of research is focused in practice-based artistic research (improvisation/jazz).

More from this issue

More from this issue

Independent artists are faced with a challenging and transforming landscape that requires adaptive resilience in order to thrive creatively, today and in the future. How do we, as tertiary educators, empower and enable artists to build strong and flexible, professional contemporary art practices? To address this issue, my current research draws models of praxis from artist-run initiatives (ARI) in the Visual Arts industry, specifically from my experience as director of Boxcopy Contemporary Art Space.

Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading

96 Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE <w:LsdException

Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading

Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading

Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading

Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading

Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading

Over 2 decades the creative art academic community has grown and matured as a sector -  so have the questions of method and purpose of publically funded research, that influence the processes of evaluation. Discussions around impact and ‘end-user’ value is a live issue at the ARC and we look forward to the new thinking that will shortly emerge. The creative arts depend almost entirely on end-user experience, and the impact of these experiences aspire to have real and meaningful impact on peoples lives...

As many in creative arts grappled with the amalgamation challenges of the 90s, few were aware that the Dawkins reforms also had increased the centrality of research to university funding. This ‘blissful ignorance’ was not to last.

In subsequent decades, as the number of creative arts staff and student researchers grew, research performance increased its influence on school funding and academic careers,  triggering an ongoing quest to equitably and comfortably position creative arts within the university research agenda... 

96 Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading

Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading

The Australian Government’s Federal Budget announcement in May was confirmation that funding for the Office for Learning and Teaching would be discontinued after this year. The news, though not unexpected, represented a blow to funding for teaching and learning scholarship in Australia.

The impact will be particularly acute for the creative arts. Australia’s universities can continue to count on research funding to support many areas of scholarship. But for a host of reasons the ARC’s record for funding and advancing creative disciplines is not high relative to other fields. With no funding for innovation in learning and teaching, the creative arts

‘In God we trust.  All others bring data,’ quipped US statistician, W. Edwards Deeming.  As he implied, measurement is an inherently conservative occupation.  Units of appraisal have to be agreed in advance, while the aim of measuring something is usually to compare it with something that already exists...

96 Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE <w:LsdException