NiTRO + Creative Matters

Perspectives on creative arts in higher education

Strategic Manoeuvres: Creative Practice Thriving? 

By Lynn Churchill and Jill Franz, IDEA (Interior Design Interior Architecture Educator’s Association) — IDEA comprises 12 International Institutions providing a minimum four-year Bachelor degree in the disciplines of Interior Design (ID), Interior Architecture (IA) and Spatial Design (SD). Most include an Honours program and the opportunity to undertake further research in Masters and PhD programs in compliance with the object of IDEA - excellence in ID/IA/SD education and research. Academic Research is a significant requirement for most academics in these disciplines.

The strength and relevance of IDEA lies in the rich diversity across, and within, the 12 programs; while at the same time they share the same dynamic external context, the impact of which has led to institutions competing nationally and internationally to elevate themselves within various university ranking systems. The contest is to re-position reputation and strategic relationships so as to attract high quality researchers and students, and therefore increase their portion of the limited available funding. The battle to prevail is political and financial.

Strategically and essentially, the disciplines of ID/IA/SD work synergistically within the domains of creative practice, science and technologies so as to re-think the many spatial typologies that have fallen into redundancy as a consequence of the pervasive rise of new technologies. We need to switch on to, and navigate, the future direction of higher education if we are to enable our students and researchers to continue to embrace such questions and opportunities. We need to ask: ‘What is the changing higher education landscape?  What are the forces impacting higher education?’

Traditionally, in Australia, the higher education sector has relied heavily on government funding. However, in this time of economic volatility and uncertainty, the Australian Government recognises that internationally, funding models for higher education are changing. Internationally, various examples of significant industry engagement, have demonstrated a revolution in how, what and where students engage in projects and learning. For the most part, technology enables innovation.

Consequently, at this time when Australia is facing tighter fiscal conditions, these changes within the higher education sector offer an opportunity to reduce government funding to both learning and teaching; and also to research. Meanwhile, government focus on political agenda and a positivist understanding that social and environmental issues are problems to be solved, emphasises science and innovation as the Holy Grail.  Government is now specifically directing funds to areas that align with their priorities, for example to Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM).

Future prospects for this approach to higher education funding include the corporatisation of education, whereby universities will be responsible for necessarily raising substantial revenue from new sources, plus cost reductions will continue.

Hence, the Catch 22 scenario, whereby universities are faced with the imperative to rise to a higher position within the rankings thereby attracting high quality students and researchers. Courses not attracting high student demand will be dropped, leaving revenue to be directed to those that can be delivered simply and quickly.

In contrast, courses relying on specialised environments and resources, with low staff/student ratios (such as design and the creative arts) will be compelled to develop less resource intensive approaches or perish.

There is pressure for curriculum ‘reform’ to prioritise standardisation of courses, with the risk that discipline specific courses will be subsumed by meta courses. Here the loss lies in discipline specific expertise and identity, and a general homogenisation of ‘design’. Emerging disciplines such as IA/ID/SD appear threatened. Similarly, research funding is threatened. Much of IA/ID/SD research constitutes creative works, the impact and quality of which is not compatible with science-based metrics and therefore difficult to measure.

It is incumbent upon design discipline leaders to make explicit the case for the value of our disciplines, to define and address government policy oversight in relation to the capacity for design disciplines to work in collaboration across various disciplines to address issues such as the impact of contemporary conditions on human occupation. Such questions demand innovative ways of imaging new futures and innovative relationships.

Design and the creative arts play a central role as part of a mutualistic system with science and technology. Paradoxically, reframing and mutualism require multi-discipline vested interests.


Lynn Churchill (Curtin University)  and Jill Franz (Queensland University of Technology) are Directors of IDEA (Interior Design Interior Architecture Educator’s Association) .

More from this issue

More from this issue

Independent artists are faced with a challenging and transforming landscape that requires adaptive resilience in order to thrive creatively, today and in the future. How do we, as tertiary educators, empower and enable artists to build strong and flexible, professional contemporary art practices? To address this issue, my current research draws models of praxis from artist-run initiatives (ARI) in the Visual Arts industry, specifically from my experience as director of Boxcopy Contemporary Art Space.

By Dr Jenny Wilson. DDCA’s Research officer Jenny Wilson caught up with Henk Borgdorff in Amsterdam in April 2016, hot on the heels of his recent speaking tour of European and UK universities, art and music schools, to find out more about artistic research and European experiences of the politics of art and higher education.
By Professor Jeri Kroll Since the Strand report (1998), scholars have been unpacking the manifold ways in which creative works can be research. Explaining the usefulness of questions to doctoral candidates not only keeps supervisors honest, but also keeps at the forefront of everyone’s mind why theory is unavoidable.
By Professor Paul Draper and Professor Scott Harrison Communities of profession, the old academy and the new academy, intimately rub up against each other and while some research may still be considered ‘more equal’ than others for now – this evolving mix can only positively impact on the rise of artistic research, its acceptance in society and its measurement by governments and universities.
By Associate Professor Cheryl Stock AM — The narrative of knowledge is almost always underpinned by the cognitive but how we know the world is often through the experiential. Whilst we have moved a long way in redefining knowledge in research terms to include the processes and outcomes of our practices (artistic, creative, professional) and importantly have privileged the artist’s voice as the expert in this recasting of what a knowledge claim might look like, some art forms prove more problematic than others in this endeavour.
By Dr Danny Butt — During the 1990s and 2000s, as readers of NiTRO know well, an intensive debate took place among art and design academics as to whether their practices and those of their graduate students could be called research, and if so what “contribution to knowledge” might be made by the creative output, as distinct from the writing that has traditionally accompanied submissions in higher degrees in creative arts.
By Professor Margaret Sheil — On my last outing in an ACUADS conference, I was described by Flinders University’s Julian Meryick as the “artist’s ideal of a scientist… impatient with the reduction of everything down to short term utility.” So as I venture once again into the creative arts domain, I draw on a scientific analogy. The principle of chemical equilibrium refers to a system in which the rate of consumption of inputs is the same as that at which outputs are produced so that the system is in a stable state of consumption and production.
By Professor Ross Woodrow — The decision by the Australia Research Council (ARC) to achieve the long-mooted merging of the Higher Education Research Data Collection (HERDC) and the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) exercise by adeptly disappearing the HERDC has been welcomed by many discipline leaders, and not just those in the creative arts. With the inclusive ERA becoming the singular evaluation of research quality across Australia, there couldn’t be a better time to rethink the classification of research in universities.
By Associate Professor Robert Burke and Dr. Andrys Onsman — Criticism of the scientific methods of doing research has increasingly pointed out that all experimental research involves some sort of creative leap. In the performing arts such creative leaps are fundamental to artistry.
By Dr Leo Berkeley — The creative practice of filmmaking, understood as a form of academic research, has been growing in scale and significance within Australian universities for several years. While doctorates involving the making of a film have been occurring for decades, it is only relatively recently that the academic screen production community has been seeking to more systematically establish how the production of a film can lead to the discovery of new knowledge.
By Dr Kate Tregloan and Professor Kit Wise — Interdisciplinarity has been widely recognised as a valuable response to the wicked problems of our time. The ability to collaborate across disciplinary boundaries brings together different perspectives and expertise, and allows entirely new approaches and solutions to emerge. To prepare students and graduates for the complex challenges of the twenty first century we need good quality interdisciplinary programs. But how do we know what is ‘good’?
By Su Baker, President, Australian Council of Deans and Directors of Creative Arts — At the DDCA annual conference in Adelaide in 2015, a group of 25 leaders in the creative arts engaged in rigorous and expansive discussion following a series of highly astute commentary and presentations by invited colleagues. Our goal was to determine how to advance our profession amidst the volatility of the higher education sector.
By Jenny Wilson — Welcome to the first edition of NiTRO, DDCA’s dedicated space for views and news in the tertiary creative arts community. Every six weeks we explore an issue of particular interest to creative artists practicing in the university sector. Our first edition focuses on the changing higher education landscape as we ask: Watt’s next for creative arts?
By Professor Margaret Gardner AO — The Australian Government’s Federal Budget announcement in May was confirmation that funding for the Office for Learning and Teaching would be discontinued after this year. The news, though not unexpected, represented a blow to funding for teaching and learning scholarship in Australia.
By Dr Tim Cahill and Professor Julian Meyrick — ‘In God we trust. All others bring data,’ quipped US statistician, W. Edwards Deeming. As he implied, measurement is an inherently conservative occupation. Units of appraisal have to be agreed in advance, while the aim of measuring something is usually to compare it with something that already exists.

By Julie Hare There are a lot of things that happen in universities that the majority of the population don’t know about. Research is one of them. The average punter – even the average undergraduate – would have little idea as the scope, scale and importance of research that takes place. And having a scientist […]

By Associate Professor Denise Ferris and Professor Marie Sierra, Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools (ACUADS) — The National Innovation and Science Agenda, launched in December 2015, has significant consequences for tertiary institutions, and in particular, for the art and design disciplines, as well as the broader arts, humanities and social science (HASS) fields.
By Dr Lynda Hawryluk, Australasian Association of Writing Programs — The ever-changing higher education landscape affects all disciplines and their related industries in a variety of ways, and the creative arts discipline is not immune to these changes and challenges.
By John Cumming and Craig Batty, Australian Screen Production, Education and Research Association (ASPERA) — Australia is engaged in completing a transition that will result in academic endeavor being placed squarely within the ‘triple helix’ of university-industry-government. Priority research projects will be those that can secure funding from ‘end-users’. The challenge for researchers is now shifting from publication and peer review to benchmarks of impact and industry engagement.